- Messages
- 1,734
- Classified ads
- 6
Hello fellow 2A CA community.
It's been brought to my attention and also in the back of my mind the changing laws for California with regards to operate a site like this. There are considerations we might implement depending on the law.
I've loaded the PDF into ChatGPT for a summarization.
New California Laws Targeting Organized Retail Crime: What You Need to Know
The California Department of Justice has introduced 10 new bills aimed at tackling the growing issue of organized retail crime, effective starting January 1, 2025. These laws bring significant changes designed to aid law enforcement and businesses in addressing retail theft and ensuring public safety. Here’s a quick summary of the most notable updates:
1. Jurisdictional Flexibility for Prosecutors: Under AB 1779, district attorneys can now file theft charges in any county where the crime occurred, merchandise was recovered, or related actions were taken by the defendant. This helps streamline cases that span multiple counties.
2. Extended Support for Property Crime Task Forces: AB 1802 eliminates the expiration date of the regional property crime task force, ensuring continued collaboration between law enforcement and the California Highway Patrol to combat organized theft.
3. Shoplifting and Theft Aggregation: AB 2943 allows the aggregation of thefts exceeding $950 in total value across multiple incidents, and creates a new crime of “unlawful deprivation of a retail business opportunity.” This targets those who hold stolen goods with the intent to sell.
4. Automotive Property Theft: SB 905 introduces a new crime targeting individuals who steal vehicle parts or tamper with vehicles for resale, expanding the scope of theft-related charges.
5. Sentencing Enhancements: SB 1416 imposes sentencing enhancements for the sale of stolen goods, particularly for thefts involving high-value merchandise exceeding $50,000. This aims to further deter large-scale theft operations.
6. Retail Crime Protective Orders: AB 3209 allows courts to issue protective orders preventing convicted shoplifters from entering specific retail establishments for up to two years, creating a legal barrier for repeat offenders.
These new laws provide a stronger framework for addressing retail crime in California, particularly focusing on high-volume thefts and organized operations. Online marketplaces also face stricter rules, requiring them to cooperate with law enforcement in identifying and curbing the sale of stolen goods.
For more details on the full text of these bills, visit California Legislature Information.
I'm not a lawyer, I'm not sure if you guys are or knows anyone who might be able to help. I've contacted the CRPA to see if we can formalize what we have here. If we're going to make this site a thing, then we have to be compliant. We will comply with all laws as necessary to ensure longevity for the site and also a good user experience. I think this is the best way to
work with the system than against it.
From my understanding we're ok, but we'll need to have additional verification measures in place by this time. I'm not sure how this will go, but looking for community assistance to navigate this craziness.
Thank you..
It's been brought to my attention and also in the back of my mind the changing laws for California with regards to operate a site like this. There are considerations we might implement depending on the law.
I've loaded the PDF into ChatGPT for a summarization.
New California Laws Targeting Organized Retail Crime: What You Need to Know
The California Department of Justice has introduced 10 new bills aimed at tackling the growing issue of organized retail crime, effective starting January 1, 2025. These laws bring significant changes designed to aid law enforcement and businesses in addressing retail theft and ensuring public safety. Here’s a quick summary of the most notable updates:
1. Jurisdictional Flexibility for Prosecutors: Under AB 1779, district attorneys can now file theft charges in any county where the crime occurred, merchandise was recovered, or related actions were taken by the defendant. This helps streamline cases that span multiple counties.
2. Extended Support for Property Crime Task Forces: AB 1802 eliminates the expiration date of the regional property crime task force, ensuring continued collaboration between law enforcement and the California Highway Patrol to combat organized theft.
3. Shoplifting and Theft Aggregation: AB 2943 allows the aggregation of thefts exceeding $950 in total value across multiple incidents, and creates a new crime of “unlawful deprivation of a retail business opportunity.” This targets those who hold stolen goods with the intent to sell.
4. Automotive Property Theft: SB 905 introduces a new crime targeting individuals who steal vehicle parts or tamper with vehicles for resale, expanding the scope of theft-related charges.
5. Sentencing Enhancements: SB 1416 imposes sentencing enhancements for the sale of stolen goods, particularly for thefts involving high-value merchandise exceeding $50,000. This aims to further deter large-scale theft operations.
6. Retail Crime Protective Orders: AB 3209 allows courts to issue protective orders preventing convicted shoplifters from entering specific retail establishments for up to two years, creating a legal barrier for repeat offenders.
These new laws provide a stronger framework for addressing retail crime in California, particularly focusing on high-volume thefts and organized operations. Online marketplaces also face stricter rules, requiring them to cooperate with law enforcement in identifying and curbing the sale of stolen goods.
For more details on the full text of these bills, visit California Legislature Information.
I'm not a lawyer, I'm not sure if you guys are or knows anyone who might be able to help. I've contacted the CRPA to see if we can formalize what we have here. If we're going to make this site a thing, then we have to be compliant. We will comply with all laws as necessary to ensure longevity for the site and also a good user experience. I think this is the best way to
work with the system than against it.
From my understanding we're ok, but we'll need to have additional verification measures in place by this time. I'm not sure how this will go, but looking for community assistance to navigate this craziness.
Thank you..
Last edited: