18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

Anyone know if the new m&p carry comp will come to the roster or the fn five seven mk3?

JR9800

Member
Messages
72
Classified ads
1
I read somewhere on Reddit that the fn was coming but nothing yet. Would also be nice to have the new m&p
 
I read somewhere on Reddit that the fn was coming but nothing yet. Would also be nice to have the new m&p
Ammo Bros. and 2A Zone both post on here, I'm sure they'll chime in shortly to show us the roster's "coming soon" baubles. And we'll all be poorer for it!
 
I have been wondering about the S&W Bodyguard 2.0 .380, considering all the praise being heaped on it by the YouTube community. S&W was able to produce a California version of the Shield, so will this one follow? Or, are they holding off in case our roster is tossed into the bin, where it belongs?

And what about the Ultimate Carry revolvers? Those would be easy to get approved.
 
M&P offers State-Compliant versions of these already, just nothing completely adapted to comply with California's requirement of the LCI. If they somehow could work that in, it would just require the safety testing & cost that goes along with that. Whether or not they will deem that to be a profitable endeavor...I wouldn't count on it. As it stands I'm sure they have plenty of consumers to cover their current manufacturing output on the new models.
 
M&P offers State-Compliant versions of these already, just nothing completely adapted to comply with California's requirement of the LCI. If they somehow could work that in, it would just require the safety testing & cost that goes along with that. Whether or not they will deem that to be a profitable endeavor...I wouldn't count on it. As it stands I'm sure they have plenty of consumers to cover their current manufacturing output on the new models.
Sadly not a optics ready version or the comp carry
 
Back
Top Bottom