18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

Legal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Voids NM Waiting Period for Firearms

Is it?
Bias does not imply bribed.
This is absolutely correct. When you have direct evidence of gifts and services being received as is the case with Clarence Thomas and other SCOTUS justices, it's appropriate to impugn their reputation(s) and even impeach, convict and remove the justice(s). Unless there is empirical evidence of corruption, it is destructive to our system of justice to smear judges just because you disagree with their rulings.
 
I didn't imply bribed. Many other factors are involved. Politics, if you haven't noticed the last 6 months.

All federal courts are political courts. They are appointed because of their politics.

No, you didn't imply it - I think he meant to say the @Robdog1 stated it as fact.
 
The no exemption for CCW holders is what gets me. I'm carrying a loaded gun on my hip while filling out the paperwork for a new gun, which I have to wait 10 days for so a cooling off period can pass, despite legally having a loaded gun on me and an armory of weapons and ammo at home.
 
All federal courts are political courts. They are appointed because of their politics.
99% of all cases in federal court have nothing to do with politics. Try going to a federal courthouse, and listen to a few hours of cases.

A lot of political cases are also decided in state courts.
 
Back
Top Bottom