Soldieringon
Active member
- Messages
- 121
“The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not ‘a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.’ The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self-defense is no different. New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms in public.”
That didn’t stop California’s elected gun-control zealots, who pushed forward stacks of bills every session, restricting the Second Amendment rights of Californians.
Well, they’ve been struck down again.
“Affirming the district court’s summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the panel held that California’s ‘one-gun-a-month’ law, which prohibits most people from buying more than one firearm in a 30-day period, facially violates the Second Amendment.”
That didn’t stop California’s elected gun-control zealots, who pushed forward stacks of bills every session, restricting the Second Amendment rights of Californians.
Well, they’ve been struck down again.
“Affirming the district court’s summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the panel held that California’s ‘one-gun-a-month’ law, which prohibits most people from buying more than one firearm in a 30-day period, facially violates the Second Amendment.”
