18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

AB1078 - New Purchase Limits, CCW Rules Starting 2026

I'm just saying, Eric Tirschwell's own ideology and approach to law is duplicitous, morally bankrupt, and presents a problematic double standard. Organizations that he's deeply embedded with, like the ADL, have no problem calling for mass civilian slaughter through a foreign country using our tax dollars to pay for the weapons, while depriving us of money that could house our homeless, and eroding our constitutional rights. He literally believes we should be giving guns to Israel, but that Americans owning guns is a bridge too far, and that we, the victims of his lawfare, should foot the bill for the genocide. Eric Tirschwell uses American courts to argue that AR-15s are 'unnecessary for self-defense,' while supporting organizations that demand the U.S. government ship those exact rifles to civilians in Israel for that exact purpose.
i'm not disagreeing and i know how it works, even though its unconstitutional it'll get passed and then no injunction despite 'status quo' being broken (see duncan).

it's insane that Bruen was 3 years ago and they didn't say anything different to Heller but here we are.

This nonsense of 'self defense' is a red herring. The standard is "commonly possessed for lawful purposes"... SCOTUS said "SUCH AS self defense" (non-limiting). But as usual California will just take something out of context and run with it. Like Kavanaugh's dicta on sensitive places let them run rampant with banning places despite the actual opinion requiring the THT test and the burden on the government.

They still bring in all this 'public safety/interest' test which Heller specifically excluded
 
Back
Top Bottom