- Messages
- 263
The Ninth Circuit just issued its decision in Baird v Bonta (Open Carry)............
Baird v Bonta is out................
- Thread starter RickD427
- Start date
guncurious
Active member
- Messages
- 94
- Classified ads
- 1
Nobody should strap on their AR and go to safeway to test it out. It looks like they upheld the requirement for an open carry permit so I guess the state is going to have to start issuing those? Probably still a lot to figure out.
Somebody will for sure. The lure to get views on the internet is stronger than common sense.
- Messages
- 610
- Classified ads
- 10
No not yet
- Messages
- 263
Nope. Only the Appellate Decision has been issued. No mandate has yet been issued on the decision.
My question is why would you want to open carry? Unless concealed is not an option. How often are you watching your 6 (I am not military, but I guess that is the best term to use). Are you always aware of your surroundings is there any time you might let your guard down.
- Messages
- 1,264
To be clear, it is UNLOADED open carry.
painkiller
Member
- Messages
- 64
Have this gone stay and en banc yet?did the state finish its 21 days?
- Messages
- 1,264
Appeal for En Banc filed 16 Jan.
- Messages
- 263
No - Please refer to FRAP Rule 41.
Please note that the state has not filed for appeal. The state has requested a rehearing. There is only one appeal in the whole legal system and it is over. A "rehearing" is different from an "appeal." A "rehearing" is much larger in scope. An "appeal" only addresses narrow and specific claims of error. A "rehearing" is a complete "do-over." If any party seeks to raise the case to the Supreme Court, that is also not an "appeal." The Supreme Court conducts "reviews" of Circuit Court decisions. The scope of a "review" is similarly much larger than the scope of an appeal.