18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

DUNCAN V. BONTA GOES TO SCOTUS CONFERENCE - California Large Capacity Magazine Prohibition

More relists than Snope now. According to google the most relisted case was Hamm v Smith, which was relisted 23 times. We're almost there.
 
Well, something must be happening. We know the last time for Snope, the votes were there. Kavanaugh decided to postpone it though, which pissed me off completely. But these issues aren’t going away, and the lower courts are all over the place. I just don’t want them to hold these until the Hemani decision is released and then GVR them, unless Hemani specifically made an actual difference with a hardware ban; which we all know it won’t because hardware bans won’t be mentioned, and there will be enough ambiguity in the decision for the lower courts to continue their games. Especially if Roberts touches and ruins everything.
 

He argues that taking an AR-15 case first and getting a win there sets a better precedent for the mags and suppressor cases.
 
Keep Calm Chill Out GIF
 
Back
Top Bottom