18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

What's new
  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

    Join freeLog in
Rost Martin R1MF comes to Califnoria

DUNCAN V. BONTA GOES TO SCOTUS CONFERENCE - California Large Capacity Magazine Prohibition

mbuss101 said:
Well this thread got off course… the simplest answer is Balkanization which the country is already seeming to do on its own. The Soviet Union collapsed before my time but look at how many nations came out of that seemingly overnight. One thing I hate about Newsom aside from the obvious is his comment he always touts “national divorce isn’t an option” Were in a failed marriage as a country and it shows in a lot of ways. Best you can hope for is a quick severance and a fast fall in standard of living to get people’s heads back to the reality of what is important in a functioning society. Anything else is just kicking the can down the road imho
Click to expand...
I'll run for governor as a 2A 👨🏻‍🎨 on a platform of "tax the rich, repeal all gun bans" and get all the votes. Problem solved.
 
If you are looking for a post and can't find it, that means I deleted it.

Back on track please - if you demonstrate the lack of self control, you will lose the ability of posting in this thread.
 
MK6M9 said:
i apologize. do not let me insert logic and reality here and distract you guys. please continue with the delusions that this has gone anywhere in the last ten years or that it will go anywhere in the next-- except another ten more years of the same exact laws and bills passed, which is exactly what has been going on in the last ten years. (shrugs). comical
Click to expand...
just so I understand, because it is not quite clear, what part exactly of this post was " Disrespectful or Uncivil Behavior ?"
 
MK6M9 said:
just so I understand, because it is not quite clear, what part exactly of this post was " Disrespectful or Uncivil Behavior ?"
Click to expand...

There is a lot to unpack and I usually charge for those sorts of things so I will give you the free version -

It was sarcastic to begin - dismissive to end.
 
i get the sarcastic part but the dismissive part? i am not allowed to think someone else's comment is not important? or is there another meaning to this? i mean, this site literally has an "roll eyes" emoji. is that not dismissive in itself? but it is okay, i see what is occurring with this.

anyway, i will move on
 
Warpspeed said:
If you are looking for a post and can't find it, that means I deleted it.

Back on track please - if you demonstrate the lack of self control, you will lose the ability of posting in this thread.
Click to expand...
Getting rid of mk6m9 from the whole california law and activism subforum would be a good start to keeping the threads more on-topic.
 
treelogger said:
Actually, my real point is the following: I strongly suspect that MK6M9 is not advocating to "get rid of anti-gun legislator" using democratic and legal means (such as voting for pro-gun legislators), but instead by making holes in the current ones. For a whole slew of reasons that should be obvious, I think that this would be a very bad approach, and even advocating in its favor does serious harm to the cause of gun rights. In one thread, we nearly got MK6M9 to admit to this, and I'm trying to get him to stop just doing the "hint hint blink blink" and instead come out and show us his cards.
Click to expand...
i have told you guys when i first came across this thread. go back a few pages
 
MK6M9 said:
i get the sarcastic part but the dismissive part? i am not allowed to think someone else's comment is not important? or is there another meaning to this? i mean, this site literally has an "roll eyes" emoji. is that not dismissive in itself? but it is okay, i see what is occurring with this.

anyway, i will move on
Click to expand...
Just a note, this particular sub-forum is even more strict than the others. Our mods have some freedom in their respective subject matter. This one is strict specifically for on-topic not too much off topic chat. Outside of this forum, we're a little more relaxed but we reserve this sub-forum for more decorum.
 
ikeo1 said:
Just a note, this particular sub-forum is even more strict than the others. Our mods have some freedom in their respective subject matter. This one is strict specifically for on-topic not too much off topic chat. Outside of this forum, we're a little more relaxed but we reserve this sub-forum for more decorum.
Click to expand...
i get that but i am not the only one in this topic, correct? i mean i can go back to those that were not deleted and give examples. that eye roll emoji is just one.
like I mentioned, i get what is going on here.

i will just move on
 
MK6M9 said:
uh huh sure. but again, how was i off topic?
Click to expand...
It was suggesting commentary outside of this particular one, not Duncan v Bonta, but talking about removing people when that isn't the purpose of this particular topic. There's quite a few lawyers and LEO (active & retired) in this thread who want to see this all the way through, even with our frustratingly annoying legislators. The main thing is they are more about process and following it through the system and also learning weak points in arguments.

This has been my interpretation watching this thread evolve. Occasionally, we get people who derail, but this one in particular is managed by another mod who made the request for a sub forum with less distractions.

We also are working on the site https://ca2a.com for a similar reason. Finding clear information is hard, so we try different things around the site in different sections.
 
For those wishing to track the activities of this case, I’ve updated Page 1 to reflect everything which has happened in the Court and between parties since Jun 30.

If you are looking for the process and current status, it’s there.
 
Last edited:
Warpspeed said:
If you are looking for a post and can't find it, that means I deleted it.
Click to expand...
PSAs like this are important and extremely valuable to those of us in the "advanced experience" phases of our lives.

Now, did you also take my car keys? :cool:
 
MK6M9 said:
i get that but i am not the only one in this topic, correct? i mean i can go back to those that were not deleted and give examples. that eye roll emoji is just one.
like I mentioned, i get what is going on here.

i will just move on
Click to expand...

you also weren't the only one who had posts removed
 
Dvrjon said:
PSAs like this are important and extremely valuable to those of us in the "advanced experience" phases of our lives.

Now, did you also take my car keys? :cool:
Click to expand...

Do you drive a Land Rover ? If yes then maybe so............
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom