18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Federal Government to sue CA over "Glock ban"?

If this gun law is over turned in a dozen or so years it would still be considered a success.

That's how our state government rolls. Time is on their side. You can be sure state lawyers review and give opinions on gun law constitutionality. Even if at risk they are encoded into law anyway thinking they will get a dozen or more years of enforcement out of them.

If over turned, no matter. They have already passed many more laws to get tied up in the courts.

Without court injunctions preventing implementation of questionable laws there will be no relief for citizens here.
 
How is banning Glocks supposed to stop a criminal from putting a switch on their stolen gun?

It has absolutely nothing to do with crime. Nothing. It has everything to do with demonizing you as a law abiding gun owner.

Just like the ammunition check law. Do you really see criminals lined up around the block to have their eligibility to buy steal ammunition checked?

And the 5 sale transactions per year? I can really see the criminals worrying about selling too many illegally trafficked guns in a year.
 
Last edited:
It has absolutely nothing to do with crime. Nothing. It has everything to do with demonizing you as a law abiding gun owner.

Just like the ammunition check law. Do you really see criminals lined up around the block to have their eligibility to buy steal ammunition checked?

And the 5 sale transactions per year? I can really see the criminals worrying about selling too many illegally trafficked guns in a year.
I wonder why only one party writes these laws
 
If this gun law is over turned in a dozen or so years it would still be considered a success.

That's how our state government rolls. Time is on their side. You can be sure state lawyers review and give opinions on gun law constitutionality. Even if at risk they are encoded into law anyway thinking they will get a dozen or more years of enforcement out of them.

If over turned, no matter. They have already passed many more laws to get tied up in the courts.

Without court injunctions preventing implementation of questionable laws there will be no relief for citizens here.
EXACTLY, thank you for this. i want to enjoy guns while I am alive, not 20 years from now. lol
 
Back
Top Bottom