18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

  • 📢 Classifieds Update — Effective Monday, September 21

    Starting Monday, the free Classifieds ad limit will be lowered from 3 to 2 active ads.

    Verified accounts will keep their limit of 3. All other account limits stay the same.

    Existing ads are not affected and will remain up until they expire.

    Want to keep 3 listings and add features like removing comments and emojis? Upgrade/Verify your account

    More information here

Hate gun roster, hmm how about tire roster?

Scary part: when getting your vehicle smogged and Item #1 on their checklist is <California Approved Tires> = Pass / Fail.
 
Michelin Energy Saver A/S. You be the judge

How is this California contrived program supposed to test every tire against every vehicle, with different pressure, different weight and different driving conditions? There is no easy way to know if it's going to work on my vehicle with my driving habits on the roads I take at the speeds I drive without actually testing them in that exact condition. The Michelin Energy Savers where tested and marketed as more fuel efficient over not LRR tires. And I'm pretty sure Michelin knows more about tires then California does.

If California says a particular tire is supposed to save me fuel and it doesn't, and doesn't let me purchase an alternative that would save me money, does California have a plan to refund the difference or create an exemption for me if their tire doesn't meet the requirements of this so called program? Unlikely.
The resistance rating is based on physics and the savings of mpg is like 1-2 mpg. if a set of tires lasts 50k and you get 26 mpg vs 25 mpg you would use 78 less gallons of fuel which at 5 a gallon is 398 dollars savings. if you paid double for the Michelins vs the other tires the savings would be a wash but I would bet they weren't double. I don't think they should have jumped to a ban on low efficiency tires from the jump, I would rather see a rating system and incentives for fuel saving tires first. But no one in this thread has data to refute the concept either. incidentally Michelin supported this bill, I don't know if that's good or bad. But I'm not ready to get upset about the bill until I see data that makes me upset.
 
Michelin Energy Saver A/S. You be the judge

How is this California contrived program supposed to test every tire against every vehicle, with different pressure, different weight and different driving conditions? There is no easy way to know if it's going to work on my vehicle with my driving habits on the roads I take at the speeds I drive without actually testing them in that exact condition. The Michelin Energy Savers where tested and marketed as more fuel efficient over not LRR tires. And I'm pretty sure Michelin knows more about tires then California does.

If California says a particular tire is supposed to save me fuel and it doesn't, and doesn't let me purchase an alternative that would save me money, does California have a plan to refund the difference or create an exemption for me if their tire doesn't meet the requirements of this so called program? Unlikely.
Do they refund us if we could add mods to our vehicle to make it more efficient or cleaner, but can't because of CARB? 🤣
 
The resistance rating is based on physics and the savings of mpg is like 1-2 mpg. if a set of tires lasts 50k and you get 26 mpg vs 25 mpg you would use 78 less gallons of fuel which at 5 a gallon is 398 dollars savings. if you paid double for the Michelins vs the other tires the savings would be a wash but I would bet they weren't double. I don't think they should have jumped to a ban on low efficiency tires from the jump, I would rather see a rating system and incentives for fuel saving tires first. But no one in this thread has data to refute the concept either. incidentally Michelin supported this bill, I don't know if that's good or bad. But I'm not ready to get upset about the bill until I see data that makes me upset.
If I'm not mistaken, it was about $160 each for the Michelins and about $70 each for the replacements. They gave me GT tires instead as the ones I purchased couldn't be delivered in time. I think those where about 80 something dollars each.
 
As so very often happens people focus on the tool (in this case tires) and steadfastly ignore human behavior (maintaining tires at proper inflation).

I'm pretty sure proper tire inflation (or lack thereof) has a far greater influence over fuel economy then most anything else.
 
If I'm not mistaken, it was about $160 each for the Michelins and about $70 each for the replacements. They gave me GT tires instead as the ones I purchased couldn't be delivered in time. I think those where about 80 something dollars each.
Fair enough but those are also objectively worse tires with a shorter warranty. Just the fact that they were designed to last for less time means they have less tread to begin with and could have had the same rolling resistance as the Michelin because it's tire weight is a big factor. Like I said I'm not saying this is definitely a good move by the state because there are a lot of factors but I also am not ready to say it's objectively bad either. Prices follow affordability and we would likely see the off brand makers like GT making cheaper versions of the premium Michelins
 
As so very often happens people focus on the tool (in this case tires) and steadfastly ignore human behavior (maintaining tires at proper inflation).

I'm pretty sure proper tire inflation (or lack thereof) has a far greater influence over fuel economy then most anything else.
But how do you regulate that? That's not something that's feasible or even desirable.
 
I keep thinking that, too. But these people just keep on voting blue like they don’t have a choice. Will people in California EVER vote for change? It’s mind-boggling.
i wish people would quit saying this. california's voting process has literally been proven to be rigged
 
it sure would be easier to remove them
Nah, this younger generation is hell bent on becoming 👨🏻‍🎨ts/ 👨🏻‍🎨s and have started voting in islamics into local government positions accross the USA and are surprised when the islamics turn against their LGBTQ+ friends and outlaw Christmas, pride flags, etc on govt property.

I want everything to collapse fast enough that these traitors to America have to live with their crimes, I mean choices in their lifetime and have no one to blame but themselves.
 
Nah, this younger generation is hell bent on becoming 👨🏻‍🎨ts/ 👨🏻‍🎨s and have started voting in islamics into local government positions accross the USA and are surprised when the islamics turn against their LGBTQ+ friends and outlaw Christmas, pride flags, etc on govt property.

I want everything to collapse fast enough that these traitors to America have to live with their crimes, I mean choices in their lifetime and have no one to blame but themselves.
i do not understand how we came to a point to where we have terrorists as our officials and in our government, for that matter. activist judges and corrupt courts, and this agenda of the World Economic Forum, UN, and the World Bank's move to make a totalitarian society. we, the citizens, are allowing all this. all anybody does about it is just sit in front of a mic and talk about it nowadays. we need to rise up and stop allowing this
 
Back
Top Bottom