- Messages
- 610
- Classified ads
- 10
I have to admit that this has not affected me for the last 20 years. But I see hope for everyone else here affected by this retard.
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
99 if memory serves. If you had em you could keep em.I wasn't old enough to own firearms in early 2000s, were we allowed more than 10 rounds before that?
There's no where else for it to go. They take it and more than likely but less than absolute certainty they find the mag ban unconstitutional. He takes the L. They dont take it and we take the L. Some people seem to believe Scotus would rather take the AWB case and naturally have a cascading effect on mag bans, rosters etc.The update from the video was they may look at this case? Doesn't really match thread title
There's no where else for it to go. They take it and more than likely but less than absolute certainty they find the mag ban unconstitutional. He takes the L. They dont take it and we take the L. Some people seem to believe Scotus would rather take the AWB case and naturally have a cascading effect on mag bans, rosters etc.
You were allowed to acquire them after that for a week in 2019...I wasn't old enough to own firearms in early 2000s, were we allowed more than 10 rounds before that?