18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Nearly a Million Investors Lost a Total of $3.8 Billion on Trump Crypto Coin

Nearly a Million Investors Lost a Total of $3.8 Billion on Trump Crypto Coin



A report from a cryptocurrency analytics firm details how those who bought the Trump memecoin have fared, with most retail investors having lost money while sophisticated traders did better.

An up-to-date tally of Trump followers turned crypto investors is in. And for them, the overall results are remarkably bad.

Nearly 1 million people who bought President Trump’s memecoin have lost money through the end of June, according to a report by the cryptocurrency analytics firm Nansen. Their losses total $3.81 billion.

The analytics firm’s assessment was calculated this week after Mr. Trump signed an annual financial disclosure showing that he walked away with a $636 million payout on the same crypto bet, part of a haul of at least $2.2 billion from all of his business ventures in 2025.

The odds were always in his favor. Mr. Trump profited whether the price of his memecoin went up or down. He collected returns whenever anyone traded the tokens, as he repeatedly pushed his followers to do, using his Truth Social account to promote the coin.

Once a crypto skeptic, Mr. Trump embraced the profit-making opportunity of digital currencies in 2024, while he was running for president. He and his sons founded a crypto start-up called World Liberty Financial, which soon began selling a coin called $WLFI that has also declined sharply.

Three days before his inauguration, Mr. Trump unveiled a second Trump-branded investment — the $TRUMP memecoin, a type of novelty currency with little practical value.
“It’s time to celebrate everything we stand for: WINNING!” Mr. Trump wrote on social media. “Join my very special Trump community. GET YOUR $TRUMP NOW!” But that turned out to be bad advice.

Most crypto transactions are publicly visible, recorded on a digital ledger called the blockchain. That allows analysts to trace purchases of digital coins from individual crypto accounts, known as wallets. Nansen’s data shows that, as of the end of June, 988,905 buyers of the $TRUMP memecoin have lost money, representing roughly two out of every three buyers.

Cumulatively, these 988,905 wallets have lost a total of $3.81 billion, including buyers who have held on to their stash and recorded paper losses, according to Nansen. The coin was trading at $1.76 as of Friday, down 97 percent from its peak price of $75.35.

Nicholas Pinto is among the losers. A frequent crypto trader who voted for Mr. Trump in 2024, Mr. Pinto said he invested a total of roughly $500,000 in the $TRUMP coin, and has now lost about half that investment.

“He is leveraging the power of being president to launch currencies, when he seems trustworthy in the public’s eye,” Mr. Pinto said in an interview. “It is kind of incredible. It is almost a legal scam.”

The White House this past week rejected any suggestion that Mr. Trump has cashed in at the expense of his followers. Since arriving at the White House, Mr. Trump and appointees have curtailed regulatory oversight of the industry, including policies related to memecoins.

“President Trump proudly made the United States the crypto capital of the world,” Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement to The New York Times after Mr. Trump’s annual report was made public on Tuesday. “All actions by President Trump and his administration are taken in the best interest of the American people.”

A representative for the $TRUMP memecoin venture did not respond to a request for comment. David Wachsman, a spokesman for World Liberty, blamed the plummeting value of $WLFI on broader market conditions that have forced down the prices of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

“No one can control the markets,” he said. “World Liberty stands behind the governance token WLFI, which has had increasing utility in a growing ecosystem since day one.”

Mr. Trump was not the only winner on the $TRUMP coin. After it launched, its price surged from less than $1 to more than $70, creating a window of opportunity for sophisticated crypto traders to extract a big profit.

These advanced traders, often using automated programs to purchase digital currencies, know that memecoins often skyrocket quickly in value and then crash, as the early buyers sell their holdings to less sophisticated, slower-moving investors hoping to get in on the action.

A little under 500,000 crypto wallets have recorded profits from $TRUMP, totaling $4 billion, according to Nansen. But that figure “reflects a small number of early buyers capturing enormous gains while the broad retail majority absorbed the losses,” the report said.

The memecoin was only one of several crypto ventures that reeled in profits for Mr. Trump and his allies.

Mr. Trump’s total profits from World Liberty reached $799 million last year, according to his financial disclosure, including hundreds of millions from the United Arab Emirates, which secretly moved in early 2025 to buy nearly half the company. A Trump business entity also collected a 75 percent cut of sales of $WLFI, after the deduction of certain expenses, guaranteeing that Mr. Trump would profit, even if the coin’s price ultimately crashed.

The losses on World Liberty’s coin are more complicated to track. Initially, the company sold the coin directly to investors, at prices of either $0.015 or $0.05, according to Nansen.

Anyone who bought the coin at $0.05 has made a slight profit, Nansen found. But $WLFI did not become widely available until September, when it started trading on secondary markets, known as exchanges.

Those transactions are not all publicly traceable. Of the 26,663 wallets that Nansen tracked, 85 percent have recorded a loss. The total losses amount to $83 million, compared to $23 million in profits.

But that is likely just a tiny cut of the overall losses — as the others buyers purchased the coins on exchanges whose data is not publicly visible. Today, World Liberty’s coin trades at $0.057, down 82 percent since September.

Despite the cratering prices, Mr. Trump has faced few consequences from his ventures, because federal regulators have largely abandoned crypto enforcement.

Stephen Gillers, a New York University law and legal ethics professor, said he would not be surprised if Mr. Trump and his partners eventually face a class-action lawsuit from followers who lost money — even though the Securities and Exchange Commission announced in February 2025 that it will no longer scrutinize memecoin deals.

The $TRUMP memecoin site had warned buyers that they should not see the token as an investment vehicle. “Trump Memes are intended to function as an expression of support for, and engagement with, the ideals and beliefs embodied by the symbol ‘$TRUMP’ and the associated artwork, and are not intended to be, or to be the subject of, an investment opportunity,” the website says.

But Mr. Gillers said that this disclosure is likely not enough to curb future legal challenges, even if they have to wait until after Mr. Trump leaves office.

“Trump back when he was a real estate developer boasted that he plays ‘to people’s fantasies,’” Mr. Gillers said. “Here he seems to have encouraged supporters to invest with the expectation they could anticipate riches — even as he himself was cashing out.”
 
Gaslight Obstruct Project GOP 🤠
I liked Guardians Of Pedophiles. I haven’t heard a good one for the DNC yet. Honestly, disparaging names are fun and all, but plenty of gaslighting, profiteering, and outright corruption goes on in both major parties. Among the 31 states (including DC) that require voters to declare a partisan registration, there are 45.4 million registered Democrats, 39.2 million registered Republicans, and over 63 million registered independent/unaffiliated voters. The latter is the fastest growing voter group. They were pivotal in Trump taking a few swing states. The money just runs too deep in the corrupt duopoly to fix anything in those institutions at this point.
 
I liked Guardians Of Pedophiles. I haven’t heard a good one for the DNC yet. Honestly, disparaging names are fun and all, but plenty of gaslighting, profiteering, and outright corruption goes on in both major parties. Among the 31 states (including DC) that require voters to declare a partisan registration, there are 45.4 million registered Democrats, 39.2 million registered Republicans, and over 63 million registered independent/unaffiliated voters. The latter is the fastest growing voter group. They were pivotal in Trump taking a few swing states. The money just runs too deep in the corrupt duopoly to fix anything in those institutions at this point.
yeah the people who keep voting for the same and expecting different results dont help. its a big club and we aint in it 🤠
 
I liked Guardians Of Pedophiles. I haven’t heard a good one for the DNC yet. Honestly, disparaging names are fun and all, but plenty of gaslighting, profiteering, and outright corruption goes on in both major parties. Among the 31 states (including DC) that require voters to declare a partisan registration, there are 45.4 million registered Democrats, 39.2 million registered Republicans, and over 63 million registered independent/unaffiliated voters. The latter is the fastest growing voter group. They were pivotal in Trump taking a few swing states. The money just runs too deep in the corrupt duopoly to fix anything in those institutions at this point.
I'll give it a shot :)
Delusional National Circus
Disinformation & Narrative Control
Don't Need Commonsense
 
I liked Guardians Of Pedophiles. I haven’t heard a good one for the DNC yet. Honestly, disparaging names are fun and all, but plenty of gaslighting, profiteering, and outright corruption goes on in both major parties. Among the 31 states (including DC) that require voters to declare a partisan registration, there are 45.4 million registered Democrats, 39.2 million registered Republicans, and over 63 million registered independent/unaffiliated voters. The latter is the fastest growing voter group. They were pivotal in Trump taking a few swing states. The money just runs too deep in the corrupt duopoly to fix anything in those institutions at this point.
You forgot about the 10 million + illegals who vote in CA. And the millions of dead Democratic voters.

-dale
 
yeah the people who keep voting for the same and expecting different results dont help. its a big club and we aint in it 🤠
Sounds like every dips$&@ who leaves CA and goes to a Red State because CA is a disaster. Then inevitably vote just how they did in CA hoping to effectively change the state to the same mess they created previously.

THAT is a true idiot. And only happens on one side of the fence. Give you three guesses which party and the first two don’t count.

-dale
 
Sounds like every dips$&@ who leaves CA and goes to a Red State because CA is a disaster. Then inevitably vote just how they did in CA hoping to effectively change the state to the same mess they created previously.

THAT is a true idiot. And only happens on one side of the fence. Give you three guesses which party and the first two don’t count.

-dale
it depends on what state they move to, but its mostly CA republicans moving to those red states by the numbers recently. so you think they move out of our state they dont like the laws of then vote for those same laws in the new red states? 39% of movers in the past 6 years are republicans while no affiliation and minor are 29% which leaves the dems under those numbers right? :unsure:
 
it depends on what state they move to, but its mostly CA republicans moving to those red states by the numbers recently. so you think they move out of our state they dont like the laws of then vote for those same laws in the new red states? 39% of movers in the past 6 years are republicans while no affiliation and minor are 29% which leaves the dems under those numbers right? :unsure:
Nobody said anything about the percentages of Republicans or Democrats moving out of CA. Makes complete sense to me that a higher percentage of Republicans are leaving this s$&thole. It’s a lost cause and just reiterates their intelligence. Nearly every conservative in CA I know can’t stand the place and inevitability will leave. 1 year….5 years…..10 years…..who knows.

What I was referring to is the dips$&t Democrats moving to Red States and voting the same way they did in CA. To think that doesn’t happen is idiotic. No matter what the main stream media pushes on the daily.

-dale
 
Nobody said anything about the percentages of Republicans or Democrats moving out of CA. Makes complete sense to me that a higher percentage of Republicans are leaving this s$&thole. It’s a lost cause and just reiterates their intelligence. Nearly every conservative in CA I know can’t stand the place and inevitability will leave. 1 year….5 years…..10 years…..who knows.

What I was referring to is the dips$&t Democrats moving to Red States and voting the same way they did in CA. To think that doesn’t happen is idiotic. No matter what the main stream media pushes on the daily.

-dale
so its mostly republicans moving to those red states tho, and then they vote for how cali laws are that they left cause they didnt like? if its mostly one side moving to the state how would they outweigh the other side 🤠
 
so its mostly republicans moving to those red states tho, and then they vote for how cali laws are that they left cause they didnt like? if its mostly one side moving to the state how would they outweigh the other side 🤠
Again…..you aren’t understanding.(shocking) Read the details, not twist words how you see fit to change the narrative.

Nobody said anything about changing the state. I said….Democrats move to Red States and continue to vote the same way they did in CA. Fact.

Are they effective at changing the state….no. Thank god.

How the F a republican going to swing a red state? Logic please

-dale
 
Sounds like every dips$&@ who leaves CA and goes to a Red State because CA is a disaster. Then inevitably vote just how they did in CA hoping to effectively change the state to the same mess they created previously.

THAT is a true idiot. And only happens on one side of the fence. Give you three guesses which party and the first two don’t count.

-dale
sorry i was just going off this and how its mostly red people going there and you brought up hoping to change the state. you know bringing up changing the state. glad i got it in under 3 guesses since the first 2 didnt count 🤠
 
You forgot about the 10 million + illegals who vote in CA. And the millions of dead Democratic voters.

-dale
Proof of that? That would hold up in a court of law? I would start with, there are 2.25 million illegals in California, not 10 million. The last lawsuit I saw filed claimed 875k inaccurate registrations due to death or relocation. And this is a problem for all states, not just California. Cases of actual fraud are pretty rare. Over 30 lawsuits filed by Trump for election fraud were dismissed for lack of evidence, many by judges Trump himself appointed. Biden became unpopular because he was corrupt and incompetent. Trump is even more unpopular because he is more corrupt and equally incompetent, following someone who was corrupt and incompetent. The Internet is filled with people trying to defend their side, whatever that is anymore, with ad hominem attacks, bald face lies, and cognitive dissonance. It always steers back to magat, libtard, 👨🏻‍🎨t, 🥔 or whatever flavor of insult suits the moment.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom