18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Feedback Open New box on CA DROS for handgun PPT

This is open for discussion or for the time being
Note for FFL's on this.
Currently the DES system will not allow you to make a correction on these DROS's.
I have one started before the update and now it tells me I can't make the correction (model typo) because the On/Off Roster question is not answered. (Was not there when the DROS was started and no option to select it now.

Fun stuff. CADOJ doesn't know when this will be fixed.
Can you use old paper form for correction still?
 
The question is to be asked of the seller, who is likely to not know PC32000 from a giant hole in the ground. and be unable to figure out the answer unless helped by the FFL, who also probably won't know the difference....

After disecting PC32000, it clearly is meant to apply to the "government adjacent" employees that were granted access to buy/posess/own (?) "unsafe handguns", but are prohibited from transferring them to the peons (unlike LEO).

If you google "CA PC32000", (a)(6)(A-V) you'll see the specific people this is meant to apply to.... you'll need to scroll down a bit. IF you're not on the list, the answer to the exemption question should be "no", as you didn't acquire the firearm under that system as a government adjacent employee on that list. Where it gets really confusing is all the exemptions to the exempt list, which includes LEO, but that theoretically would be an exemption to an exemption, so that's a "no", er... maybe?

DOJ site states that PPT's are exempt from being on the roster, but that's apparently an entirely different exemption from those in PC32000 - are you swearing yet?

I think this was likely to try to track persons on the exempt list (A-V) and block them from making a illegal transfer, but since PPTs usually have completed a financial transfer... it might screw a unaware and innocent buyer??? And if an exempt (A-V) person inocently doesn't realize they are prohibited or know PC32000 from a hole in the ground... do they go to jail? Were their 5th amendment rights violated? Does a chicken have lips? Sigh...

For a more thorough analysis, see my other recent post to the crazy thread on SSE exemptions.... page 10-ish....
 
Update: Answering honestly Non Roster, and no, DROS went through. We are thinking it is a way to track LEOs reselling for profit.
 
Back
Top Bottom