18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

  • 📢 Classifieds Update — Effective Monday, September 21

    Starting Monday, the free Classifieds ad limit will be lowered from 3 to 2 active ads.

    Verified accounts will keep their limit of 3. All other account limits stay the same.

    Existing ads are not affected and will remain up until they expire.

    Want to keep 3 listings and add features like removing comments and emojis? Upgrade/Verify your account

    More information here

OA Defense said no to CA

Route66ShootingSportsPark

Well-known member
CAguns Vendor
📝 Contributor
Messages
416
Good afternoon Scott,


Regrettably, I must inform you that OA Defense is going to postpone a dedicated California roster gun indefinitely. This is due to many factors, not the least of which is pending legislation that would make gun manufacturers liable if their firearms are used in a deadly crime. When we partnered, I know one of the big enticements was the version that would be available to the civilian market. Since we aren't bringing that to fruition, I'm authorized to offer you a full refund on existing inventory that you have that is in pristine condition. If you'd like to continue the partnership and remain a stocking LE only dealer, we will obviously welcome that! Please let me know how you'd like to proceed.


Thank you in advance and have a good one!

Respectfully,
OA Defense
 
You know for what its worth...kind of similar, kind of not..
Back in 2005 I believe it was, Ronnie Barrett (owner of Barrett Firearms) put out a letter that he would not sell his firearms to government entities that operate in states (specifically California, New Jersey, New York) where those same firearms couldn't be owned by the people that resided within, and that the states SHOULD NOT BE EXEMPT OF ITS OWN LAWS.
I greatly respect that view/stance.
Route66 do you want(or need) to push products for a brand that will not play ball for the people but will give you a little side action for the LEO only community?

(For the uninformed: Ronnie Barrett said no because the 50 BMG was banned for civilians yet government entities within the banned states were still requesting rifles chambered in 50 BMG)
 
Product appeal aside, the stated reason for not selling to the California public as:

"pending legislation that would make gun manufacturers liable if their firearms are used in a deadly crime."

Is there something going on in the CA legislature of which I'm not aware? And if so, Federal preemption would make such efforts irrelevant, no?
 
You know for what its worth...kind of similar, kind of not..
Back in 2005 I believe it was, Ronnie Barrett (owner of Barrett Firearms) put out a letter that he would not sell his firearms to government entities that operate in states (specifically California, New Jersey, New York) where those same firearms couldn't be owned by the people that resided within, and that the states SHOULD NOT BE EXEMPT OF ITS OWN LAWS.
I greatly respect that view/stance.
Route66 do you want(or need) to push products for a brand that will not play ball for the people but will give you a little side action for the LEO only community?

(For the uninformed: Ronnie Barrett said no because the 50 BMG was banned for civilians yet government entities within the banned states were still requesting rifles chambered in 50 BMG)
This hits the nail on the head.

Why anyone in the firearms community would continue to sell arms to LEOs that have continually and repeatedly stood behind laws that exclude them, but deny us the opportunity to purchase guns sold everywhere else in the country, is something I fail to understand.

Start treating them as we are treated and maybe their leadership and unions won’t be so fast to get behind the democrats in the state legislature that continually saddle us with their stupid and vague laws.

The era of firearms enthusiasts and law enforcement as brothers in arms is a thing of the past. Let them have a taste of their own medicine and see how they like it.
 
Good afternoon Scott,


Regrettably, I must inform you that OA Defense is going to postpone a dedicated California roster gun indefinitely. This is due to many factors, not the least of which is pending legislation that would make gun manufacturers liable if their firearms are used in a deadly crime. When we partnered, I know one of the big enticements was the version that would be available to the civilian market. Since we aren't bringing that to fruition, I'm authorized to offer you a full refund on existing inventory that you have that is in pristine condition. If you'd like to continue the partnership and remain a stocking LE only dealer, we will obviously welcome that! Please let me know how you'd like to proceed.


Thank you in advance and have a good one!

Respectfully,
OA Defense
In other news… no one buys OA and it’ll be bankrupt soon. Meh
 
Wait. If the gun is used in a crime they can be sued?
How about when a cop sells one to a civilian and then they sell it a few more times and it ends up in a crime? Are they off the hook then ? Or are they just retarded and think cops hold onto everything they buy 😂
 
You know for what its worth...kind of similar, kind of not..
Back in 2005 I believe it was, Ronnie Barrett (owner of Barrett Firearms) put out a letter that he would not sell his firearms to government entities that operate in states (specifically California, New Jersey, New York) where those same firearms couldn't be owned by the people that resided within, and that the states SHOULD NOT BE EXEMPT OF ITS OWN LAWS.
I greatly respect that view/stance.
Route66 do you want(or need) to push products for a brand that will not play ball for the people but will give you a little side action for the LEO only community?

(For the uninformed: Ronnie Barrett said no because the 50 BMG was banned for civilians yet government entities within the banned states were still requesting rifles chambered in 50 BMG)

I don't think OA Defense has a large enough footprint in CA to matter. It's a very niche product to begin with and I don't see a lot of traffic for it even in free states. I think the Platypus and Staccato HD line dominates in that 2011 (or double stack 1911) taking cheaper mags space.
 
Back
Top Bottom