OAL requirements and SCOTUS AWB case

[mbuss101]

Curious if the AWB case the Supreme Court has goes our way if it would have any effect on the OAL requirements the state has for long guns IE would side folders be on the menu? Hoping someone who’s more knowledgeable on the nuances of Californias AWB would have input on this.

 

[JL2103]

Is it cool and fun? Probably not.

Sure hope so though

 

[BONECUTR]

CA restrictions on OAL being 30 inches is just regarding AW's
Rimfire/Bolt Action, ect, can be 26 inches or greater.

Depending on the ruling it will determine what CA can or can't restrict. You just hope its crystal clear to where CADOJ will loose any challenges they try to put in place.

Like Bruin and ca immediately passing SB2 cause its "different"
CADOJ will trying to find a work around ban just like we try to find a work around their ban.

 

[CadeH]

Unfortunately the recent case is only about whether the NFA can remain in place since they reduced the tax to zero. A previous case said the nfa was constitutional on the grounds that it was a tax. The current case isn't about which arms car he regulated

He's referring to Viramontes, which is the AWB. Jensen is the NFA case

 

[RustVendor]

He's referring to Viramontes, which is the AWB. Jensen is the NFA case

Too many goddamn cases, I was focused on jensen because of length. However yes Viramontes could definitely change things.