When it comes to legal matters, the attorney that makes the most convincing argument (even if it's not backed by facts or truth), "wins". The old saying about DA's being able to "indict a ham sandwich" (or an "unpopular" candidate for public office) applies..... When you examine 2A related cases, you see the "arguments", some are pretty lame!
The Glock "switch" suits are particularly onerous, where the company did not invent, market, promote or sell the "machine gun" mod, yet is being prosecuted for an "dangerous" (and illegal) modification to an otherwise legal product... It's absurd to say that an engineer/designer is supposed to anticipate every possible modification that any Bubba might cook up after a few beers and make sure that no such modification could ever possibly take place in the "future"...
Is it "gun violence" if a "discharge" is uncommanded, negligent, or accidental"? I think not, but I'm sure some anti-2A types would disagree. Blaming an inanimate object is so much easier... and to a degree satisfying when no "responsibility" for bad choices needs be assigned?
The "manual of arms" can be radically different on different firearms, I've got a few oddballs that I had to show the counter staff how to do the required "safety demonstration" on when doing a PPT... If one has "trained" to a degree that you handle a firearm via "muscle memory" and you change to a different firearm, with different controls... you have to "retrain" a bit!
I've seen many YT videos trying to reproduce the "mechanical failure mode" that replicates the UD in a P320, haven't seen any that are 100% convincing as to what causes the cases where the gun just goes off either untouched, or during some manipulation. I have read the suggestion that perhaps it is due to improper maintenance/wrong parts, bad tolerances allowing things to move that shouldn't... honestly, I can't say one way or another, sometimes guns do act up, and that's why they need to be treated with respect and handled properly! The good ol' "4 laws" apply.
The Glock "switch" suits are particularly onerous, where the company did not invent, market, promote or sell the "machine gun" mod, yet is being prosecuted for an "dangerous" (and illegal) modification to an otherwise legal product... It's absurd to say that an engineer/designer is supposed to anticipate every possible modification that any Bubba might cook up after a few beers and make sure that no such modification could ever possibly take place in the "future"...
Is it "gun violence" if a "discharge" is uncommanded, negligent, or accidental"? I think not, but I'm sure some anti-2A types would disagree. Blaming an inanimate object is so much easier... and to a degree satisfying when no "responsibility" for bad choices needs be assigned?
The "manual of arms" can be radically different on different firearms, I've got a few oddballs that I had to show the counter staff how to do the required "safety demonstration" on when doing a PPT... If one has "trained" to a degree that you handle a firearm via "muscle memory" and you change to a different firearm, with different controls... you have to "retrain" a bit!
I've seen many YT videos trying to reproduce the "mechanical failure mode" that replicates the UD in a P320, haven't seen any that are 100% convincing as to what causes the cases where the gun just goes off either untouched, or during some manipulation. I have read the suggestion that perhaps it is due to improper maintenance/wrong parts, bad tolerances allowing things to move that shouldn't... honestly, I can't say one way or another, sometimes guns do act up, and that's why they need to be treated with respect and handled properly! The good ol' "4 laws" apply.