18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

Philly revokes permits of gun owners exercising their rights.

Bro you sound like a "Fed" trying to rile up people. Quit it man...no here agrees with you.

I personally don't give a rats ass about gang members doing stupid đź’©. If you have a ccw and you're admitting to gang ties and associating with felons and confronting police while armed I'm not surprised that their permits got revoked.

Every CCW class teaches the 3 rules
Don't go to Stupid Places at Stupid Times with Stupid People. Its seems like those morons broke all three.
Yeah he is a glowie haha. "Let's go get in armed confrontations with police and state our mission is to attack DHS agents". Did these guys go to the Renee Good school of "protesting"? lmao. You're 100% spot on, nobody here, at least nobody conservative here is calling for violence or to kill police or politicians. We can save that for the reddit 🍌s that seethe about "not being able to say what they really mean" about the President and ICE etc.
 
Bro you sound like a "Fed" trying to rile up people. Quit it man...no here agrees with you.

I personally don't give a rats ass about gang members doing stupid đź’©. If you have a ccw and you're admitting to gang ties and associating with felons and confronting police while armed I'm not surprised that their permits got revoked.

Every CCW class teaches the 3 rules
Don't go to Stupid Places at Stupid Times with Stupid People. Its seems like those morons broke all three.
You sound upset.
 
Yeah he is a glowie haha. "Let's go get in armed confrontations with police and state our mission is to attack DHS agents". Did these guys go to the Renee Good school of "protesting"? lmao. You're 100% spot on, nobody here, at least nobody conservative here is calling for violence or to kill police or politicians. We can save that for the reddit 🍌s that seethe about "not being able to say what they really mean" about the President and ICE etc.
You literally worked for the federal government, glass houses ect ect.
 
You literally worked for the federal government, glass houses ect ect.
Maybe I'm the PSYOP
Nothing Ever Happens Look At The Time GIF
:p
 
Common sense of only being able to exercise your right in specific ways allowed by the state, yeah you guys can agree to that and me pointing it out is "trying to rile you up". 🤠
 
Common sense of only being able to exercise your right in specific ways allowed by the state, yeah you guys can agree to that and me pointing it out is "trying to rile you up". 🤠
I don't think any of us would argue you have a right to use your firearms against law enforcement because you don't agree with immigration enforcement
 
I don't think any of us would argue you have a right to use your firearms against law enforcement because you don't agree with immigration enforcement
Did they use the firearms against them? wouldnt that be an actual crime not "good cause" and "Creating a public safety" problem :unsure:
 
If said "gentlemen's" conduct was above reproach when they were "exercising their rights" surely they would have grounds to sue the issuing agency for their permits and damages?
 
If said "gentlemen's" conduct was above reproach when they were "exercising their rights" surely they would have grounds to sue the issuing agency for their permits and damages?
Retacco has requested that the city solicitor's office immediately restore the licenses. you mean like that?
 
You can request anything. If their rights were violated they need to sue in court. That's how our government functions.
 
You can request anything. If their rights were violated they need to sue in court. That's how our government functions.
so if the city solicitor denies them, what do you think the lawyer will do next. Put on your common sense hat
 
Did they use the firearms against them? wouldnt that be an actual crime not "good cause" and "Creating a public safety" problem :unsure:
idk but according to the articles it was part of their mission statement
 

wonder if this is related :unsure:
 
Leading with “good cause” as a rationale for cancelling CCW licensure seems to twist the basics of Bruen (anybody remember Bruen?)

Even the CA AG figured it out:
On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in New York State Rifle &
Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) 142 S.Ct. 2111 (Bruen). The next day, the Attorney General issued Legal Alert No. OAG-2022-02, which concluded that the “good cause” requirements set forth in California Penal Code sections 26150(a)(2) and 26155(a)(2) were unconstitutional and
unenforceable under Bruen.
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/legal-alert-oag-2022-03.pdf

If one cannot use “good cause” to issue/deny issue of a CCW does it not follow that one cannot rescind a CCW for “good cause”?

Enquiring minds, etc.
 
Last edited:
Wow it’s crazy how some gun folks just don’t agree with these people’s politics and conclude that it’s fine for the government to revoke their right to bear arms without due process
 
People not there lost their lic to carry, people that have been charged with nothing lost their lic to carry. Some of you are cheering because, well I don’t know. Just because you don’t agree with them doesn’t mean you should cheer them losing access to their rights.

The entire permission slip to carry thing still boggles me coming from a constitutional carry state. No blood in the streets, no panic, just people going about their lifes.

Pre crime and guilt by association is bull💩. What’s next, generational guilt? Well your parents sucked so you don’t have all your rights either?
 
People not there lost their lic to carry, people that have been charged with nothing lost their lic to carry. Some of you are cheering because, well I don’t know. Just because you don’t agree with them doesn’t mean you should cheer them losing access to their rights.

The entire permission slip to carry thing still boggles me coming from a constitutional carry state. No blood in the streets, no panic, just people going about their lifes.

Pre crime and guilt by association is bull💩. What’s next, generational guilt? Well your parents sucked so you don’t have all your rights either?
Amen. Not a lot of logical consistency going on with the people who agree with this. Crazy
 
Back
Top Bottom