18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

Railgun Installed On Japanese Warship Seen In New Photos

USMC06RET

Well-known member
Messages
800
Railgun Installed On Japanese Warship Seen In New Photos

1751410948126.png

New pictures have emerged showing work being done on the Japan Self-Defense Forces’ prototype electromagnetic railgun currently installed on the test warship JS Asuka. An at-sea test of the weapon in this configuration is expected to come before the end of the month, if it has not occurred already. Japan’s continued developments in this realm stand in notable contrast to the U.S. Navy’s shelving of its promising pursuit of this category of weapons in the early 2020s after major technical hurdles emerged.

The images of Asuka and its railgun in port in Yokosuka, seen at the top of this story and below, come from @HNlEHupY4Nr6hRM on X who originally posted online. All of the images were taken on June 30. Additional photos of the ship taken recently are also circulating online. Asuka, a 6,200-ton-displacement dedicated testbed with a warship-like design, first emerged with the turreted railgun on its stern flight deck in April. More....
 
I wonder if the cost, energy consumption, repeat strike capabilities, range, projectile size, charge time, maintenance, etc will surpass regular gun powder shell equipped turrets.
 
well projectiles cost nothing. it's think when the US Navy was testing them there were issues with the "rails" themselves not holding up? the energy could be generated, but it was hard to come up with rails that could put up with real world usage.
 
well projectiles cost nothing. it's think when the US Navy was testing them there were issues with the "rails" themselves not holding up? the energy could be generated, but it was hard to come up with rails that could put up with real world usage.
Didn't we switch, at least publicly, to researching laser weaponry for defense and upped are ship launched missile game?
 
Didn't we switch, at least publicly, to researching laser weaponry for defense and upped are ship launched missile game?
yeah. lasers for close in because you are literally talking about unlimited ammo (as long as your power supply exists) and fewer current issues with the tech. and then upping the ship launched missiles cause we are actually good at that.

rail guns I THINK are still sorta problematic over the horizon (someone can correct me if Im wrong) cause well. they shoot a little too straight. and again, at least previously the US Navy couldn't figure out the rapid failure of the barrel/rails
 
Back
Top Bottom