By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
I'm not sure that you know what you're talking about.Revolvers would Not have LCI and mag disconnect, how/why did the State win the argument for rostering revolvers? Was looking for a Taurus Judge in .410 and couldn't get any because of the silly crazy roster.
I'm not defending the concept of the roster. IMHO, it's an unconstitutional statute. But then, my personal opinion don't count for much.Ok bad example, but my question is around if the 9th Circus struck down microstamping but allowed LCI and mag disconnect, why would they apply to revolvers? Seems the "California needs to lab test and certify" should be the core of the lawsuit.
LCI and mag disconnect only apply to semi-auto pistols.Ok bad example, but my question is around if the 9th Circus struck down microstamping but allowed LCI and mag disconnect, why would they apply to revolvers? Seems the "California needs to lab test and certify" should be the core of the lawsuit.
…..
It's not the safe handgun roster that affects the Taurus Judge. It's a felony to simply possess a Taurus Judge in California. That's a much stronger prohibition that the one created by the roster.
The problem with the Taurus Judge is that it meets California's state law definition of a Short Barrel Shotgun (even it it does not meet the federal law definition) and that makes the simple possession a felony under Penal Code section 33215.
The purpose of the "revolving cylinder shotgun" ban was to ban the Street Sweeper.Yes, and if memory servers me correctly, CA also does not allow shotguns with a revolving cylinder magazine.
Not quite sure what there motive was here, but hell, it’s California…
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!