- Messages
- 180
- Classified ads
- 2
It was my understanding that an "undertermined" status means that the firearm can be legally released to the purchaser, correct?
If that is correct, and RCGE elects not release on an Undetermined because of liability concerns, then they should eat the cost of DROSing it back to the seller when they choose not to release it.
The point of the FFL conducting a DROS is compliance with government regulations. If the FFL would be compliant in releasing on an Undetermined, but elects not to because of legal liability concerns, then they should be paying the costs associated with that decision. The buyer has done their part, and the government hasn't said they can't have it. Only the FFL is deciding not to let them have it. So...the FFL should pay for the return DROS to the seller.
Seems simple, but that again assumes that I am correct about Undetermined status.
If that is correct, and RCGE elects not release on an Undetermined because of liability concerns, then they should eat the cost of DROSing it back to the seller when they choose not to release it.
The point of the FFL conducting a DROS is compliance with government regulations. If the FFL would be compliant in releasing on an Undetermined, but elects not to because of legal liability concerns, then they should be paying the costs associated with that decision. The buyer has done their part, and the government hasn't said they can't have it. Only the FFL is deciding not to let them have it. So...the FFL should pay for the return DROS to the seller.
Seems simple, but that again assumes that I am correct about Undetermined status.