By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
Its a cool range im still gona keep goingThis has been posted multiple times now. Honestly not seeing it as a big deal. They want a theft deterrent.
That goes against the constitution. my fellow sonic lover bro, I can even lookup people's license plate hits and I'm not even a cop. lol.My issue isn't with the cameras themselves its the lack of any checks when it comes to their usage. It should require a warrant to search someone's license plate through this system. If they are scanning bluetooth, you need a warrant to access that information etc. Warrants have to be tailored and as specific as possible, no "list every car that has driven on this street in the last week" bullthey try to do with cell phone towers pinging.
I don't like the system either but I wouldn't stop going to my favorite range over one either.Too much potential for abuse. It’s a system run by humans, and some humans consistently abuse whatever authority they hold. Add to that the misread license plate issues that are happening too often, getting innocent people detained for literally nothing.
It’s way too much Big Brother for me. And the likelihood is Flock cameras would help me out way more than they’d ever hurt me, I’m a boring, law abiding old guy, but I still hate living in a surveillance state.
I haven’t had to make that decision yet, but state run surveillance cameras might help me decide to find another range. I’d definitely let the management know that CCTV wouldn’t bother me, but Flock would.I don't like the system either but I wouldn't stop going to my favorite range over one either.
And it’s corporate big brother, so it’s only motivation is profit..Flock isn't a surveillance camera... we've had surveillance camera for decades. It's a massive network that uses ai image recognition. None of the cameras are owned by the government, or in this case the private business. The cameras are leased, and I highly suspect that flock has full access to the data collected by the cameras.
If it isn't big brother already then it is a step towards big brother.
Welcome to the future. You don't have the freedom to not be recorded in public, whether you agree with it or not. Others have the freedom to record youThis is a real disappointment, because it is an excellent range. Maybe the best outdoor range in SoCal for zeroing weapons, teaching kids away from the concussive environment of an indoor firing line, etc. But in a community/subculture that is deeply entrenched in exercising rights and championing freedom it’s seem like a pretty tone deaf move. You don’t give up freedom for security. I would hope we all know that Ben Franklin quote along those lines. We spend a lot of time talking about the founding fathers, why ignore them on this? Even if you have “nothing to hide” why would you want your movements documented, analyzed by very fallible AI and shared (for profit) through a network of private information brokers?
Everybody is entitled to have their own line about what they’re willing to accept when it comes to infringement upon their personal freedoms. Some are willing to give it up for candy bars. Don’t. Freedoms are easily lost and almost never regained.
As for R66, yelling at them to change is unlikely to have the desired effect. It’s a real shame, but their choices have already been made. We can only control our own choices and what we support with our votes and our money.
But you'll drive by the cameras on the way to any other range? lol...... people really don't thinkIt just means im not visiting their range.![]()
0 flocks in my aeraBut you'll drive by the cameras on the way to any other range? lol...... people really don't think
Plenty of other cameras, LPR's that aren't Flock branded0 flocks in my aera
This is the way. “We’re already in too deep for anything to matter anymore might as well quietly submit” is a real bummer of an outlook on freedom.It just means im not visiting their range.![]()
Which freedom is that per US constitutionThis is the way. “We’re already in too deep for anything to matter anymore might as well quietly submit” is a real bummer of an outlook on freedom.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!