18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Legal SKS with arch angel stock Legality

Is it?
Yes. As a practical matter, 922(r) appears to have very little standalone enforcement against ordinary individual owners, especially for something like a one-off SKS furniture swap.


But I’d separate three points:


First, the law is real. If someone assembles the rifle into a non-sporting configuration with too many imported counted parts, that can technically violate 922(r).


Second, proving it is awkward. The government would have to care enough to prove assembly, configuration, and imported-parts count. On an old SKS with swapped furniture, that is not usually an attractive standalone case unless there is some other criminal investigation already happening.


Third, most real-world risk is collateral. It is more likely to matter if the rifle is seized for another reason, involved in another case, sold commercially, transferred through a shop that cares, posted online while arguing about compliance, or examined by an agency already looking for charges. It is much less likely that ATF is hunting random SKS owners over Archangel stocks.
 
Pretty sad when all of us don't have a concise answer as to whether we can own something because the laws are so f'd up in this state
Alas, 18 U.S.C. § 922 is a federal statute, not a California law. We can’t blame our state lawmakers for that particular one.
 
Don't be so emotional man. How is the law being violated, and what is the enforcement? Any similar cases to cite?

Critical Thinking > Emotions
No emotion involved.
Changing parts on an imported firearm can violate 922(r). How F-ing hard is that to understand? Telling people to intentionally violate federal law is the work of an idiot. Not that I'm calling you personally an idiot. Apparently that would be a violation of group rules. Apparently it's ok if you tell people it's ok to violate federal law so you couldn't be an idiot 🙄
 
No emotion involved.
Changing parts on an imported firearm can violate 922(r). How F-ing hard is that to understand? Telling people to intentionally violate federal law is the work of an idiot. Not that I'm calling you personally an idiot. Apparently that would be a violation of group rules. Apparently it's ok if you tell people it's ok to violate federal law so you couldn't be an idiot 🙄
People smoke weed/ vape THC/ eat gummies everyday here in CA in violation of federal law. They also break the speed limit and roll stop signs. So what
 
No emotion involved.
Changing parts on an imported firearm can violate 922(r). How F-ing hard is that to understand? Telling people to intentionally violate federal law is the work of an idiot. Not that I'm calling you personally an idiot. Apparently that would be a violation of group rules. Apparently it's ok if you tell people it's ok to violate federal law so you couldn't be an idiot 🙄
ignore list is a beautiful thing, just sayin.
 
People smoke weed/ vape THC/ eat gummies everyday here in CA in violation of federal law. They also break the speed limit and roll stop signs. So what
You do you boo. Admin on this site doesn't give a 💩 if you personally tell people to violate federal law. It's on you and the admin of this site. Hopefully the impressionable young people on this site are smarter then you.
 
ignore list is a beautiful thing, just sayin.
I know. But dumbF-s should be called out. Not that anyone in this thread is a dumbF-. Because calling out dumbF-ery would violate site rules.
 
I know. But dumbF-s should be called out. Not that anyone in this thread is a dumbF-. Because calling out dumbF-ery would violate site rules.
don’t get dragged down, it’s not worth it. especially the one I saw you quoting next move is to try and “fight you”. how they are still here I don’t know.
 
don’t get dragged down, it’s not worth it. especially the one I saw you quoting next move is to try and “fight you”. how they are still here I don’t know.
Oh, I hear you. But someone has to stand up for people who don't understand the law. It sucks when people they think they can trust actively suggest they should violate federal law.
 
You do you boo. Admin on this site doesn't give a 💩 if you personally tell people to violate federal law. It's on you and the admin of this site. Hopefully the impressionable young people on this site are smarter then you.
I mean you claim to be such a genius and so much smarter than the rest of the forum, are you able to provide some similar cases where swapping a stock onto a SKS resulted in a 922r conviction? I'm probably one of the youngest active members here, ha!
 
don’t get dragged down, it’s not worth it. especially the one I saw you quoting next move is to try and “fight you”. how they are still here I don’t know.
Just because you got shut down and proven wrong doesn't mean you're dragged down
 
I mean you claim to be such a genius and so much smarter than the rest of the forum, are you able to provide some similar cases where swapping a stock onto a SKS resulted in a 922r conviction? I'm probably one of the youngest active members here, ha!
Are you telling people to intentionally violate federal law or not?
 
While I work with attorneys, I am not an attorney and couldn't advise whether or not this configuration is legal or not legal.
That wasn't the question. In your previous posts in this thread you have suggested people ignore federal law. True or false?
 
gotcha. Fight the good fight. I just ignore it, no one listens anymore anyways.
I have no doubt that admin on this site will ban the person suggesting it's a bad thing to suggest not telling people to violate federal laws. It's sad really.
 
That wasn't the question. In your previous posts in this thread you have suggested people ignore federal law. True or false?
Yeah considering the fed govt isn't prosecuting weed businesses or 922r cases under the current administration, you are free to take the risk you are comfortable with. I can't tell you yes or no, that's up to you. I noticed you were unable to and failed to provide any convictions or cases, so I think we don't have much to worry about with OP's rifle.
 
Yeah considering the fed govt isn't prosecuting weed businesses or 922r cases under the current administration, you are free to take the risk you are comfortable with. I can't tell you yes or no, that's up to you. I noticed you were unable to and failed to provide any convictions or cases, so I think we don't have much to worry about with OP's rifle.
You're ignoring the question.
 
Back
Top Bottom