18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

Springfield Echelon Strike SMC Bravo Chassis

M_N04H

Unknown member
CAguns Supporter
2026 2 25+ 2 Mostest
Messages
1,498
Classified ads
3

Anyone tried one of these? Looks interesting. I just know we can't have anything on the front that resembles a second grip, and a pistol brace only. Anything else to look out for? Magazine is in the grip so no need to lock, unlike an AR pistol for example.
 
I'm also very interested in one of these
I know the legality in CA is kinda gray though... yeah things on the surface look like it would be legal as long as you don't option/install a foregrip/2nd magwell/barrel shroud, but the lack of legal precedent for pistol braces in CA makes it weird...
Technically as the letter of the law sits today: in theory it should be legal...
But as we know in CA the letter of the law will only get you so far... -_-
 
Played with the p320 in Texas it was interesting. I think the p365 sized one would have fit the role better. Have no idea how that would work here though.
 
Back
Top Bottom