18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

Talk me into getting the Springfield M1A Standard or Loaded model

Which M1A model should I get?

  • Walnut M1A Loaded Model

    Votes: 4 44.4%
  • Walnut M1A Standard Issue Model

    Votes: 5 55.6%

  • Total voters
    9
I'll give you my perspective having used a "Loaded" model and later upgrading to a "Supermatch." Shot plenty of other friends' standard models to compare.

Weight and balance: The loaded is about 4-5 ounces more than standard. The extra 5 ounces is the heavier barrel, but it is just 2-3 inches more right in front of the receiver. This is more in the center of the rifle-not at the end of the barrel. The weight is still in the center of balance of the rifle so it doesn't make it "nose-heavy".

Match vs standard barrel: The standard barrels are made by the same mfr as the loaded barrels, the same blanks, just a different profile-no difference in steel nor rifling. No special "match barrel" enhancements. The standard shoots just as well. The medium weight barrel doesn't enhance or tolerate heat build-up that much better than standard.

Triggers: The so-called "NM" enhanced trigger isn't really any better or smoother than the standard. You want a really good trigger? Send it to Ted Brown, Fulton Armory, Smith Ent, etc, about $85-100 for a true trigger job that you will feel the difference.

Sights: Rear sights are the same 1/2 MOA windage, 1 MOA elevation clicks. Front sight of the Loaded is a NM: slightly thinner than the standard. Works great if shooting NRA SR target bullseye, since the front sight is exactly the same width as the bullseye at 200-600 yards for 6 O'clock hold. Regular sight is perfectly fine for regular shooting.
FRIJdNd.jpg

Thanks for that insight from someone with experience.
 
Another (possible*) option: Wait for the CMP M-14s. Actual USGI rifles. CMP says they will be ~$2k. Best deal in town.


* I say ‘possible’ because it’s unknown if CMP will remove the flash hiders for CA customers to avoid the CA AWB.
 
Another (possible*) option: Wait for the CMP M-14s.
Yes, keeping an eye on that. We probably will have to use one of our CAguns middleman FFL's to get it here.

I figure it might be a while till I get one. When the 1911's came out it was a couple years of the lottery to get one. But after the initial rush, there's no waiting for the 1911's. A lot of interest for the M14's, just have to decide if you want an M1A now or wait two years for the Christmas rush to die down for an M14....
 
Yes, keeping an eye on that. We probably will have to use one of our CAguns middleman FFL's to get it here.

I figure it might be a while till I get one. When the 1911's came out it was a couple years of the lottery to get one. But after the initial rush, there's no waiting for the 1911's. A lot of interest for the M14's, just have to decide if you want an M1A now or wait two years for the Christmas rush to die down for an M14....
I got lucky on the 1911s. I got one from the initial lottery, and another from the second batch.

I wasn’t thrilled with my first one - Service Grade, RR slide/frame with heavy park. It went back in the hard case unfired by me. I’m still not sure what to do with it, haha!!

Second one was much better - Field Grade, Colt slide/US&S frame w/original finish. Exactly what I was looking for. Though it’s still in it’s hard case unfired my me, haha!!

Hoping for good luck once they open orders for the M-14s!!
 
Back
Top Bottom