18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Torn between optic choices for SP-01

This is great. Your SRO looks way better than the 507comp which looks like a 80s TV on that little slide (don’t tell her I said that). I might just bite the bullet and get an SRO. I wonder what a middle ground 507c would look like and if the extra window from the comp is that big of a difference
I definitely prefer the SRO. The bezel on the 407 and 507 comp is thicker and I feel like I'm looking through a square tube. The SRO is thinner and way less obvious
 
CGW internals, barrel, with Delta Point Pro up top. It's an absolute tack driver.
I shot my stock SP-01 (except stainless guide rod) today for the first time and WOW it is accurate. Even compared to my 75BD it seems more inherently accurate, and (not surprisingly) way flatter shooting and faster on follow-ups. I’m SO excited to Cajunize it and get a dot on there!
 
This actually looks really nice. I might go this route.
I like it a lot, like I said before if there were better options to run the RMR footprint on the CZs I would say it doens't really matter but it's definitely nice to direct mount.
 
I asked the person who did the optic cut and they said there wasn't enough material to recut 😥
I feel like that can't be true, I think it only is longer to the rear but it's not even that much.
 
Drew at Vigilante (who I intend to have cut my slide) said he likes to cut them as far back as possible. So I could see how if you cut for one footprint then wanted to cut a bigger one there might be no room to the rear.
could be for sure
 
Here is a picture of my direct mill.
 

Attachments

  • 1000008393.webp
    1000008393.webp
    23.9 KB · Views: 11
Here is a picture of my direct mill.
ah yeah it would be in the middle of the sight, so its possible but it would be ugly and not ideal. I did see a weird rmsc sight yesterday called the Gideon Judge Xl, it's kinda cheap looking but its huge.
 
Big heavy gun needs a big dot, I got the impact machine slide as well for an RMR (it was the “ready to ship footprint” and it’s nice. 507 comp on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom