Got this in the NRA e-mail today. Hard to believe... American Rifleman Article
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
A completely legitimate electionIf they are very liberal and voters how does SB 2 happen?
Very liberal voters account for 24.6% of frequent carriers even though they make up only 12.9% of likely voters. Similarly, very conservative voters account for 23% of frequent carriers while making up 18% of likely voters. Republicans also carry frequently at disproportionately high rates, while Democrats and Independents/Other carry at relatively lower rates.”
The categories were independent of each other and apparently you could mark more than 1 to describe yourself. You could be "very liberal" and "Democrat"...Ok so what political ideology are "very liberal" voters if Democrats carry at lower rates? Are we talking Anarchists? They hate our government and want to destroy it, yet they exercise a right that is in our Constitution. Theres some important context missing from this study.
Hmm... sounds like a study design flaw. Whats the point of the study if there is no meaningful interpretation of the findings? What is their ideology/political affiliation? It seems they are a small portion of voters so maybe not very influential. Possibly extremist antigovernment views?The categories were independent of each other and apparently you could mark more than 1 to describe yourself. You could be "very liberal" and "Democrat"...
Click into the study and it will be more clear.
You made me go back and figure it out... The "Very Liberal" to "Very Conservative" was one question that allowed the voter to pick only 1. Then there was a separate party affiliation selection: Democrat/Republican/"Independent and Other". They displayed the result of both questions side-by-side on the same graph...Hmm... sounds like a study design flaw. Whats the point of the study if there is no meaningful interpretation of the findings?
It's the Uniparty that wants to take the guns away.People ccw and support 2a on both sides of the political spectrum for the same reasons. They just get there from different directions.