- Messages
- 235
- Classified ads
- 3
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno
Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno
The only thing I could think of is if the gun was sold with a 10+ round mag then the mags couldn't legally be brought back.Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno
For now..The only thing I could think of is if the gun was sold with a 10+ round mag then the mags couldn't legally be brought back.
Our Dear Leaders would need to either try to say that it is illegal to purchase out of state (in direct contradiction to this ruling), or they would need to try to make the Roster apply to OPLAW transfers/registrations.
Watch California implement some kind of convoluted state law to try to prevent this. They can’t regulate interstate commerce, but they can try to tie it up in the courts using our tax dollars for years. This state sucks.
you know the governor would sign something like that the same day it opened up.Watch California implement some kind of convoluted state law to try to prevent this. They can’t regulate interstate commerce, but they can try to tie it up in the courts using our tax dollars for years. This state sucks.
5th Circuit covers Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, but legal rulings set precedentsIncludes us Californians?
What about the 10 day wait?
In person only or shipped to my door?
We the people need to know...asap!
I will happily make that drive.At this time, correct (I think).
Our Dear Leaders would need to either try to say that it is illegal to purchase out of state (in direct contradiction to this ruling), or they would need to try to make the Roster apply to OPLAW transfers/registrations.
Sadly, California FFLs would still be bound by the Roster, so wanting something cool and shiny would require you to physically go out of state to buy and then bring it back.
The only thing I could think of is if the gun was sold with a 10+ round mag then the mags couldn't legally be brought back.
Like that’ll stop peopleThe only thing I could think of is if the gun was sold with a 10+ round mag then the mags couldn't legally be brought back.
I'd drive to AZ to buy an M9A3 or A4 and it will work just fine with the 92fs mags I already have.True, if the mag capacity ban is still in effect in this hypothetical scenario, you’d have to leave/sell/block them before coming back.
Still, that would be a minor inconvenience compared to the roster as a whole. Hell, some of the off-roster variants’ differences are literally only the mags they come with (eg Beretta 92FS that come with 10 vs 15rd mags)
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!