18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

  • 📢 Classifieds Update — Effective Monday, September 21

    Starting Monday, the free Classifieds ad limit will be lowered from 3 to 2 active ads.

    Verified accounts will keep their limit of 3. All other account limits stay the same.

    Existing ads are not affected and will remain up until they expire.

    Want to keep 3 listings and add features like removing comments and emojis? Upgrade/Verify your account

    More information here

5th Circuit finds the ban on direct interstate sale of handguns unconstitutional.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno

At this time, correct (I think).

Our Dear Leaders would need to either try to say that it is illegal to purchase out of state (in direct contradiction to this ruling), or they would need to try to make the Roster apply to OPLAW transfers/registrations.

Sadly, California FFLs would still be bound by the Roster, so wanting something cool and shiny would require you to physically go out of state to buy and then bring it back.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno

Watch California implement some kind of convoluted state law to try to prevent this. They can’t regulate interstate commerce, but they can try to tie it up in the courts using our tax dollars for years. This state sucks.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this potentially sidestep the limitations placed by the roster entirely? If interstate purchasing becomes allowed, nothing would (legally) prevent CA residents from joining @doggman61 in racking up credit card debt in Reno
The only thing I could think of is if the gun was sold with a 10+ round mag then the mags couldn't legally be brought back.
 
Our Dear Leaders would need to either try to say that it is illegal to purchase out of state (in direct contradiction to this ruling), or they would need to try to make the Roster apply to OPLAW transfers/registrations.

Watch California implement some kind of convoluted state law to try to prevent this. They can’t regulate interstate commerce, but they can try to tie it up in the courts using our tax dollars for years. This state sucks.

I can absolutely see the state trying something else to keep the level of overbearing restriction up. Hopefully, if this comes to pass, there will be a window of opportunity (Freedom Week 2.0?) to grab off roster goodies before the next BS law or tax burden gets put in place. Best to keep a close eye on this.
 
Watch California implement some kind of convoluted state law to try to prevent this. They can’t regulate interstate commerce, but they can try to tie it up in the courts using our tax dollars for years. This state sucks.
you know the governor would sign something like that the same day it opened up.

I %100 GUARANTEE YOU Bontas team is working on something right now. (To keep you and our streets safer)
 
Last edited:
Includes us Californians?
What about the 10 day wait?
In person only or shipped to my door?
We the people need to know...asap!
 
At this time, correct (I think).

Our Dear Leaders would need to either try to say that it is illegal to purchase out of state (in direct contradiction to this ruling), or they would need to try to make the Roster apply to OPLAW transfers/registrations.

Sadly, California FFLs would still be bound by the Roster, so wanting something cool and shiny would require you to physically go out of state to buy and then bring it back.
I will happily make that drive.
 
The only thing I could think of is if the gun was sold with a 10+ round mag then the mags couldn't legally be brought back.

True, if the mag capacity ban is still in effect in this hypothetical scenario, you’d have to leave/sell/block them before coming back.

Still, that would be a minor inconvenience compared to the roster as a whole. Hell, some of the off-roster variants’ differences are literally only the mags they come with (eg Beretta 92FS that come with 10 vs 15rd mags)
 
True, if the mag capacity ban is still in effect in this hypothetical scenario, you’d have to leave/sell/block them before coming back.

Still, that would be a minor inconvenience compared to the roster as a whole. Hell, some of the off-roster variants’ differences are literally only the mags they come with (eg Beretta 92FS that come with 10 vs 15rd mags)
I'd drive to AZ to buy an M9A3 or A4 and it will work just fine with the 92fs mags I already have.

This law change will be terrible for my bank account.
 
So what’s happening now? We can go to Nevada and buy a Walther steel frame match? ELI5

If we can buy across state lines this will be insane plus everyone trying to flip off roster guns is going to lose everything overnight

I feel like a galaxy brain now for never paying an off roster premium
 
Back
Top Bottom