18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Law Appeals Court Blocks California’s Background Checks for Ammunition Buyers - (7-24-2025)

Well it looks like the guy in the article about Freedom week does not care about DOJ since he names himself and the city he lives in.



“It’s a dying industry,” he said. “It’s not a friendly or fun business anymore. When you regulate and regulate and regulate, you kill an industry. And that’s what they want to do in California.”

That was the most profound quote from that article. And unfortunately, it was also the cold hard truth.
 
Well it looks like the guy in the article about Freedom week does not care about DOJ since he names himself and the city he lives in.

There are probably hundreds of people with the name "JR Young" in San Jose, assuming this is even a real name.
 
There are probably hundreds of people with the name "JR Young" in San Jose, assuming this is even a real name.
Perhaps, but if it is a real name, it wouldn't be difficult to find him. Using tools such a the automated firearms systems and other LEO databases it is easy to see which Youngs own firearms in San Jose and narrow your search from there. Not saying that they will do this, as it is likely a waste of time, but you would be surprised how many databases there are to find out what you want.

Retired LEO - May 2021 and 100% pro 2A. Never thought it was fair that I was able to purchase off roster firearms or standard capacity mags when the general public is excluded.
I am new here, but have a decent history at Calguns under the same name.
 
Got some today in the mail.. I knew you shoulda done it within the first few hours of the decision.. And find a good place to buy online lol
No, i don't think so. There was an incredible amount of time to decide and buy. I work at a major shipper and ammo is flowing through our systems today (and i expect a few more days). As long as sellers marked the orders as 'shipped' within the time we had, they sent them out. I have not heard of majors shippers reversing orders
 
“It’s a dying industry,” he said. “It’s not a friendly or fun business anymore. When you regulate and regulate and regulate, you kill an industry. And that’s what they want to do in California.”

That was the most profound quote from that article. And unfortunately, it was also the cold hard truth.

you nailed it, that is the entire goal of CA DOJ: regulate, tax and add friction to the gun/ammo purchasing process and ultimately frustrate both buyer & seller into submission. and it works so they'll never stop throwing up hurdles, heck I've only purchased a few new things since they added the 11% tax on top of our already ridiculous sales tax
 
you nailed it, that is the entire goal of CA DOJ: regulate, tax and add friction to the gun/ammo purchasing process and ultimately frustrate both buyer & seller into submission. and it works so they'll never stop throwing up hurdles, heck I've only purchased a few new things since they added the 11% tax on top of our already ridiculous sales tax
This was a quote from the article, not my words. I do 💯 agree with it. It is exactly what has been happening in CA for decades. It is illegal, and our judicial system knows it. For all intensive purpose the courts are worthless. Even when gun owners get thrown some bread crumbs, CADOJ and the state comeback around with more sinister regulations than the ones before.
 
Gentlemen, can we please get back on topic here? I am looking to this thread for updates on Rhodes v. Bonta. Sorry for being selfish. T
here are other threads for Off Topic stuff.
 
Checking in to see if the deadline of today will either be a mandate from the 9th circus or more shell game bull💩 from newscum and his F-tard buddy bonta.
 
Back
Top Bottom