By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Prior to this ruling, an FFL03+COE holder (or anyone) could sell ammo to an FFL03+COE holder. They could also sell to non-licensees, but they would have needed to use an ammunition vendor. If they wanted to sell more than 500 rounds per month, they would have needed an ammunition vendor license, themselves.One cannot resell ammo with an FFL03, as far as I know.
Who? Do tell.I guess no one got this. One cannot resell ammo with FFL03.
Care to guess who said "I have my FFL03" and subsequently have multiple ammo for sale ads?![]()
Prior to this ruling, an FFL03+COE holder (or anyone) could sell ammo to an FFL03+COE holder. They could also sell to non-licensees, but they would have needed to use an ammunition vendor. If they wanted to sell more than 500 rounds per month, they would have needed an ammunition vendor license, themselves.
If the stay is truly lifted (and a new stay pending en banc appeal isn't put in place), then everybody can sell to everybody else through Face-to-Face transactions. While the constraint on selling no more than 500 rounds without the AV license remains in place, it would seem to be rendered moot by the provisions which appear to have killed AV requirements for transfers.
It’s a tale as old as time. For those of us that have played all these games in CA in the past, this is exactly what to expect. From gun bans based on classification, magazine capacities, rosters, taxes, fee’s, and various other shake downs, we have all seen this movie before.Bulletin to FFLs (should be no surprise):
View attachment 79916
Bulletin to FFLs (should be no surprise):
View attachment 79916
The whole system has been run (RIGGED) this way for decades in CA. None of this should come as a surprise. Those who haven’t been in this game very long will scream “fUuUuuuuuUUUdD!”So...............It's unconstitutional but you still have to wait for some bullpiece of paper to be sent out from the 9th. Total BS.
At least some got to celebrate their crumbs. “fweeeedUmb!!!”It appears the shutting down of freedom week has already begun. So about 3 or 4 business days for this year's edition of freedom week.
You’ll be fine. Just don’t forget the first two rules of Fight Club.Oh ok I had just ordered some yesterday like around midnight not sure if that’s ok.
This is my understanding as well based on the exception for FFL-03 / COE holders in section (c)(6)Prior to this ruling, an FFL03+COE holder (or anyone) could sell ammo to an FFL03+COE holder. They could also sell to non-licensees, but they would have needed to use an ammunition vendor. If they wanted to sell more than 500 rounds per month, they would have needed an ammunition vendor license, themselves.
If the stay is truly lifted (and a new stay pending en banc appeal isn't put in place), then everybody can sell to everybody else through Face-to-Face transactions. While the constraint on selling no more than 500 rounds without the AV license remains in place, it would seem to be rendered moot by the provisions which appear to have killed AV requirements for transfers.
Things could be different this time around but based on the previous “Ammo Freedom Week” which had very similar circumstances, majority of retailers shipped orders out as long as it was placed before the “Stay”……. there were a few folks that received an email from the online store that they had placed the order from saying that they are unable to ship due to the “Stay” despite placing the order prior to but I think that’s more of the retailers decision…..again things could be different this time around, but I guess we’ll find out so stay tunedDang I had just ordered some ammo too. Would I have to contact the company to have my order cancelled?
No. You ordered it legally. The same thing happened during Freedom Week with magazines. Most retailers continued to ship well after the stay was issued, as long as the purchase was made before the injunction was stayed. People seem to forget the first injunction in Rhode v. Bonta as well. A LOT of ammo was ordered before the stay pending appeal was issued, and most retailers shipped out all of that, too. I still still have several cases of 12 gauge trap shells in my garage from that event.