By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
DA/SA? I'll let her try one of my hammer-fireds, but I expect she'll be partial to the consistency of strikers. I'm also conscious of a frame safety.Beretta PX4. The rotating barrel really cuts down on felt recoil.
I'll have to look into FN. Similar reliability/low maintenance?If you are sticking with 9. All those listed are an excellent options. Something to consider, I have heard FN's 9 lineup is very good.
A geriatric female is a viable .380 scenario too without knowing many personal specifics.
I really like the idea of a 22 for early fundamental training, but as something she can rely on for home defense (which I should have said earlier, that will be the main function), 22 is a bit lacking.Some of those guns are big, far bigger than a regular sized woman can handle comfortably. And unless your certain this chick digs getting knocked around, don't start her off with a 9mm. 22's are fun and the least intimidating caliber. .32 and .380 are also sensible for a petite shooter. Don't get a gun that's too small, as that will tend to kick harder. Too big of a gun is hard to hold steady. I don't have a P365 in .380, but something in that ballpark seems sensible.
DA/SA? I'll let her try one of my hammer-fireds, but I expect she'll be partial to the consistency of strikers. I'm also conscious of a frame safety.
I'll have to look into FN. Similar reliability/low maintenance?
I have only heard great things about FN and their 9s. I'd be willing to bet FN's 9s have exceptional reliability and a low maintenance requirement. Unfortunately, I don't have actual experience with them yet. *Manifesting sugar momma*I'll have to look into FN. Similar reliability/low maintenance?
Too interested to help after too many drinks. Mr. Matt is correct. FN is roster F'edI’d suggest a PX4 Type C if you can find one. One trigger pull kind of like an HK LEM. I have one in .40 and really like it. FN makes a good product too but I don’t think any of them are on the unconstitutional “roster.”

I’d suggest a PX4 Type C if you can find one. One trigger pull kind of like an HK LEM. I have one in .40 and really like it. FN makes a good product too but I don’t think any of them are on the unconstitutional “roster.”
All good guys...Roster is not a concern. Taking all recs.Too interested to help after too many drinks. Mr. Matt is correct. FN is roster F'ed
In that case the M&P shield EZ is the way to go.A few of the recommendations are for micros. I updated the post to show the purpose is for home defense. Compact/Full Size grips will be far easier to control, with no need to consider concealability.
M&p HD steel frame (not aluminum) then.All good guys...Roster is not a concern. Taking all recs.
Hmm...heard of the Shield EZ and the Equalizer. Didn't know if they were hype or legitimately different. In practice, the PDP-F had a shorter trigger reach, but didn't seem noticeably different from the Compact in terms of racking.In that case the M&P shield EZ is the way to go.
Well if roster is no concern... lol https://waltherarms.com/defense/pdp/pdp-steel-frame-match-full-size-5-inAll good guys...Roster is not a concern. Taking all recs.
I don't think modern firearms will really get much easier to rack than that just due to physicsHmm...heard of the Shield EZ and the Equalizer. Didn't know if they were hype or legitimately different. In practice, the PDP-F had a shorter trigger reach, but didn't seem noticeably different from the Compact in terms of racking.