That’s why a lot of them are not selling right now. I like the P a lot more than HDP4I'm kinda surprised I would figure with the new Staccato HD's now on the roster. That it would have helped level out the prices on the other Staccato's.
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
That’s why a lot of them are not selling right now. I like the P a lot more than HDP4I'm kinda surprised I would figure with the new Staccato HD's now on the roster. That it would have helped level out the prices on the other Staccato's.
Agreed. I prefer a series 70 over the series 80.That’s why a lot of them are not selling right now. I like the P a lot more than HDP4
I conceal carry a C compact and it is phenomenal. C4X looks pretty rad though. Want to try that out.Agreed. I prefer a series 70 over the series 80.
Yeah but $3500 for the C4X plus all the taxes you're looking at around $4200 OTD. Talk about over inflated prices this C4X takes the cake.I conceal carry a C compact and it is phenomenal. C4X looks pretty rad though. Want to try that out.
4688 I think it was in my countyYeah but $3500 for the C4X plus all the taxes you're looking at around $4200 OTD. Talk about over inflated prices this C4X takes the cake.
I’ve got a few 1911s and I don’t think I paid more than 500 bucks for any of them. The one I shoot the most I paid $300 for and I’ve probably got 40,000 rounds through it. I don’t recall any failures that were not ammo or magazine related with that gun either.I never said they were good guns or worth anything. What I said is the market dictates the price, and the price is inflated right now due to demand.
Along the same lines of what you said, however, I can say the same about all these $3,000+ 2011's that have popped up over the past few years. Talk about overpriced...




My wife says it’s the equivalent of her bag obsession.I’ve got a few 1911s and I don’t think I paid more than 500 bucks for any of them. The one I shoot the most I paid $300 for and I’ve probably got 40,000 rounds through it. I don’t recall any failures that were not ammo or magazine related with that gun either.
I do drool over some of the high-end 1911 but honestly, they do about the same thing. They just look sexy AF while they’re doing it.
I did that with primers and .22LR during COVID for the exact same reason. Don’t be surprised to see them in the MP for $1k ea before you get home from signing the transfer papers.I’m about to ppt two of my Glocks. I sold them for $0 each hoping to get two people started down the road to more active shooting and home defense.
I wrote "lol" on a posting and got a warning from this site.I’ve noticed an influx of Gen 3 Glocks being posted for absurd prices and want to know how many of these are actually being sold? I am getting Gen 5s cheaper than Gen 3s are being asked for. It doesn’t seem fair to the 2A community to be priced gouged by people who just signed up for the forum days prior to posting. This is the equivalent of a toyota corolla being sold for 30k! Rant over!
A free market operates on supply and demand with minimal or no government intervention. The Democrat Supermajority in this state has launched a government assault on California gun owners’ constitutional rights to keep and bear arms. In this latest intervention, they have targeted Glocks — choking off supply, and thereby increasing demand for the artificially limited supply. These price gougers are not capitalizing on a free market; they are capitalizing on state government intervention in the marketplace of the worst kind. Glock gougers are profiting off the state’s infringement of their fellow gun owners’ civil rights. Don’t try to church it up with your tired “free market, move on” mantra.Just stop complaining, its called a "Free Market", if you do not like the price then do not buy it and buy something else.
Correct. The $ocialist Republic of Calicrapistan hasn't been a free market in decades.A free market operates on supply and demand with minimal or no government intervention. The Democrat Supermajority in this state has launched a government assault on California gun owners’ constitutional rights to keep and bear arms. In this latest intervention, they have targeted Glocks — choking off supply, and thereby increasing demand for the artificially limited supply. These price gougers are not capitalizing on a free market; they are capitalizing on state government intervention in the marketplace of the worst kind. Glock gougers are profiting off the state’s infringement of their fellow gun owners’ civil rights. Don’t try to church it up with your tired “free market, move on” mantra.
** Either way "supply and demand" is what's going on.. Prior to the glock ban, people were not interested in them and now they are..... Capitalism is simple and it does not matter (w/ minimal or no government intervention) if a product is WANTED and the PRODUCT is there and someone is willing to pay for it then it is what it is. ex. Are you a home owner who bought a home 30 years ago and willing to sell that same home at the price bought w/ slight increase? Same difference, if the price is too high eventually the price will go down. Back to the being a "gun" there are other comparable (key word) guns so why a glock, because the PERSON now wants that particular thing.A free market operates on supply and demand with minimal or no government intervention. The Democrat Supermajority in this state has launched a government assault on California gun owners’ constitutional rights to keep and bear arms. In this latest intervention, they have targeted Glocks — choking off supply, and thereby increasing demand for the artificially limited supply. These price gougers are not capitalizing on a free market; they are capitalizing on state government intervention in the marketplace of the worst kind. Glock gougers are profiting off the state’s infringement of their fellow gun owners’ civil rights. Don’t try to church it up with your tired “free market, move on” mantra.
That’s not true. Lots of competition shooters have Glock 34’s and 17’s in their stable with tens of thousands of rounds down the pipe. One of my favorite things to see is someone with a plain Jane Glock outperforming shooters with “better platforms “ with “better triggers.” I just saw a few people competing in Production and Carry Optics with Glock 19’s. For people who are really into shooting skills and competing Glock is still an option.** Either way "supply and demand" is what's going on.. Prior to the glock ban, people were not interested in them and now they are..... Capitalism is simple and it does not matter (w/ minimal or no government intervention) if a product is WANTED and the PRODUCT is there and someone is willing to pay for it then it is what it is. ex. Are you a home owner who bought a home 30 years ago and willing to sell that same home at the price bought w/ slight increase? Same difference, if the price is too high eventually the price will go down. Back to the being a "gun" there are other comparable (key word) guns so why a glock, because the PERSON now wants that particular thing.
I have a NIB Glock 34.3 listed for $850 (still close to or at my out the door cost, back in November 2025).I wrote "lol" on a posting and got a warning from this site.
I don't see how that's post crapping but I think people selling stock gen 3 glocks for 800+ are ridiculous.
I've been a gun owner/trader/Hunter for a long time and the fun community has some of the worst gouging and scalping I've seen. CA laws make things a lot worse of course, but I think we should be able to Shame this kind of behavior.
+.Regardless of *why* supply is lower and demand higher, we're still talking about market forces; supply and demand. Nobody is forced to buy any specific gun so there cannot be gouging in play.A free market operates on supply and demand with minimal or no government intervention. The Democrat Supermajority in this state has launched a government assault on California gun owners’ constitutional rights to keep and bear arms. In this latest intervention, they have targeted Glocks — choking off supply, and thereby increasing demand for the artificially limited supply. These price gougers are not capitalizing on a free market; they are capitalizing on state government intervention in the marketplace of the worst kind. Glock gougers are profiting off the state’s infringement of their fellow gun owners’ civil rights. Don’t try to church it up with your tired “free market, move on” mantra.