What I find interesting is how one can say "It’s worth whatever someone is willing to pay" then spend the next posts explaining why nobody should pay it.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If you don’t think a Gen 6 Glock is worth the premium, don’t buy one. If you think another brand offers better value anyone can buy those instead. Awesome. Free country. Free market.
But we have politicians who want to control this market.
Nobody is saying you have to like Glocks. Nobody is saying marked up off roster firearms are the best value on earth. But if your position is that value is determined by what buyers are willing to pay,
then arguing with buyers because they don’t share your personal valuation seems a little strange.
I mean imagine if some of you ran for office. You’d be full-on woke Karen Bass types, convinced everyone needs to think exactly the way you do lol.
So understand why politicians do this. A desire to control how to think. Stop that

haha.