18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

  • 📢 Classifieds Update — Effective Monday, September 21

    Starting Monday, the free Classifieds ad limit will be lowered from 3 to 2 active ads.

    Verified accounts will keep their limit of 3. All other account limits stay the same.

    Existing ads are not affected and will remain up until they expire.

    Want to keep 3 listings and add features like removing comments and emojis? Upgrade/Verify your account

    More information here

How would you design a CCW qual?

How rigorous should a CCW qual be?

  • Rigorous

  • Basic

  • Minimal

  • No qual required


Results are only viewable after voting.
Yet to operate a deadly vehicle (far more likely to kill others than your constituionally God granted CCW) essentially no training is required and an unbelievably easy test..... make it make sense. The only legal argument I could see is going to the open carry permit-less and a tougher CCW license for concealed.
My opinion for driving is near the same too, I just didn't bring it up because this is a gun forum and not a car forum. Don't assume
 
just for 💩s and giggles, why shouldnt non citizens be allowed to defend themselves while in our country? Do they not have the right to be secure in their person and due process either. Or should they have to take some form of test, which fair enough, maybe 🤠
Wouldn’t mind an international permitting system for travel.
 
What say we use that 11% excise tax to fund and underwrite the cost of a CCW and the training?
I like the idea.

Part of the challenges in making CCW qualifications more demanding is that very quickly they will exceed the requirements of sworn law enforcement.

Alameda County already requires CCW applicants to pass the very same range test their sworn Deputies must pass.

Logically anything more stringent for CCW applicants should apply to law enforcement throughout the State.

I suspect there - as usual - would be a law enforcement exemption for such things. Unions being powerful as they are, and law enforcement already being deeply challenged to fill the ranks. An example from Alameda County: https://www.ktvu.com/news/47-alamed...ctory-on-psych-evaluations-relieved-of-duties
 
I think they require enough hoops jumped through for a protected “right”.

Should we have to take speech class to have free speech?

Covid /2020 was wild. Should be studied, suddenly lots of liberals are gun owners. Maybe good, maybe 💩.

Reminds me of Californians invading Texas.
 
I'm surprised how many people voted "rigorous". This is a Constitutional right, not a privilege. Can't tell you how many old grandmas I sold a firearm to who just wanted something to be able to carry to keep themselves safe. Should an 80 year old lady be denied the right to defend herself because she can't qualify expert marksman with her little 380? At the absolute MOST, I'd say pass a basic criminal history check to get a carry permit. Ideally, a carry permit doesn't even exist because you shouldn't need permission to exercise your rights.
 
I'm surprised how many people voted "rigorous". This is a Constitutional right, not a privilege. Can't tell you how many old grandmas I sold a firearm to who just wanted something to be able to carry to keep themselves safe. Should an 80 year old lady be denied the right to defend herself because she can't qualify expert marksman with her little 380? At the absolute MOST, I'd say pass a basic criminal history check to get a carry permit. Ideally, a carry permit doesn't even exist because you shouldn't need permission to exercise your rights.

john_marsten_1873 says yes, F- grandma and her rights. She can't hit a quarter at 25 yards kneeling? Get F-ed. He just won't admit that's his true intentions.

Next up free speech class, and you only get to vote after passing your voting knowledge exam, and so on​

 

john_marsten_1873 says yes, F- grandma and her rights. She can't hit a quarter at 25 yards kneeling? Get F-ed. He just won't admit that's his true intentions.​

Lol, well in his defense, we really all should be John Wicks if we're going to carry a gun. How else will she be prepared to take on 30-40 attackers from 100 yards with her J frame Smith?
 
Lol, well in his defense, we really all should be John Wicks if we're going to carry a gun. How else will she be prepared to take on 30-40 attackers from 100 yards with her J frame Smith?
Pretty sure he has me blocked or something because he can't handle the heat. (lol)

Yeah exactly. Grandma gets no gun rights and let's take away her voting rights while we are at it, she didn't pass the voting license qual
 
I like the idea.

Part of the challenges in making CCW qualifications more demanding is that very quickly they will exceed the requirements of sworn law enforcement.

Alameda County already requires CCW applicants to pass the very same range test their sworn Deputies must pass.

Logically anything more stringent for CCW applicants should apply to law enforcement throughout the State.

I suspect there - as usual - would be a law enforcement exemption for such things. Unions being powerful as they are, and law enforcement already being deeply challenged to fill the ranks. An example from Alameda County: https://www.ktvu.com/news/47-alamed...ctory-on-psych-evaluations-relieved-of-duties
And it's kind of crazy Alameda county does that, since officers are in shootouts far different than what a citizen needs to engage in for self defense. We aren't going offensive like they are. Why do you need to be able to shoot a micro .380 at 25 yards to defend yourself from a mugger 3 feet away?
 
Pretty sure he has me blocked or something because he can't handle the heat. (lol)

Yeah exactly. Grandma gets no gun rights and let's take away her voting rights while we are at it, she didn't pass the voting license qual
Maybe if grandma hit up the range more then hobby lobby for knitting supplies she could hit the target from 25 yards. Skill issue :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom