- Messages
- 683
And you?And there's bingo!
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
And you?And there's bingo!
Notice my avatar SHOWS me, yours's does not!And there's bingo!
Notice my avatar SHOWS me, yours's does not!
Yeah I’d reckon a sailor is not a soldier! HahaI was a real soldier, you were not.
lol oh boy. Well the military gave me imminent danger pay so must have had some harmNever put yourself in harms way did you?
I respect all aspects of the game yet I also see who does what.
…. yet another point that proves why the those who argue against carrying chambered are objectively in the wrong.Reading through almost 10 pages of new posts since I last looked at this thread, something occurred to me.
How do revolvers fit into or affect the chambered or not debate?
If all cylinders are loaded on a DA/SA revolver that is effectively chambered carry. But no one argues those should be carried with an empty cylinder. Yet, when it comes to semiautos there seems to be a raging debate.
I don’t get it.