18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

What's new
  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

    Join freeLog in
Rost Martin R1MF comes to Califnoria

Announcement Roster Week!

Still nothing, but you know government workers and all that let’s give them some time.
 
pancakes said:
triggers are relative to use case. Most people should not have a 2LB trigger not just that but Glock triggers are easy to master. I dont think they are bad just has a learning curve. Once you master them all triggers are easy. Besides the Hellcat no fukin clue what Springfield was thinking there
Click to expand...

I'm sure one can master all kinds of trigger given enough time but that's not the point I'm making. I'm saying from a product and pricing perspective their offering is not good enough. You buy a $1000 variant of the Walther PDP and it'll come with a performance trigger of a short.
 
pancakes said:
Idk i run my Glocks with stock triggers and can win comps here and there. TBF every pistol out there is missing something or can be upgraded in some manner. Its like ice cream its just flavors pick the one that you like and run it
Click to expand...
But shadow systems cost twice as much
 
RustVendor said:
If you just agreed with me this wouldn't happen! Lol
Click to expand...
I posted the original question of what happened to the companies who had a chance to make compliant changes like SS. Everyone else went off about XYZ after. We know Glock didn’t/wont make the changes so that left SS as the only option to get glockish pistols to the CA market.
 
mbuss101 said:
Yeah I didn’t want to bully r66 but we’ve only got a couple months left for 2026 to be the year of the Glock as they promised
Click to expand...
Ya not really their fault it’s California. But on the same note I operate on a believe when I see it mode with laws and new guns in CA. Not being pessimistic, but the democrat cog of government will do anything to impede the 2A.
 
mbuss101 said:
I posted the original question of what happened to the companies who had a chance to make compliant changes like SS. Everyone else went off about XYZ after. We know Glock didn’t/wont make the changes so that left SS as the only option to get glockish pistols to the CA market.
Click to expand...
Glock did try, that one guy did a Public Records Act request to DOJ for Glock and they were having meetings. But who knows if they will get it done Glock is notoriously very slow to get new models out.
 
RustVendor said:
Yeah, shadow systems
Click to expand...
honestly i hope that they add every single pistol to the roster only so that we can laugh at all the resellers trying to sell a gen 3 Glock for $1000

Comedy Laugh GIF by For(bes) The Culture
 
timthetwin said:
Ya not really their fault it’s California. But on the same note I operate on a believe when I see it mode with laws and new guns in CA. Not being pessimistic, but the democrat cog of government will do anything to impede the 2A.
Click to expand...
It is their fault for running their mouth like they were absolutely sure it would release. They did the same thing with the CC9. Now they are saying that their relationship with HK's rep group has deteriorated. I don't know what happened behind closed doors, but repeatedly broadcasting preliminary product information before manufacturers announce it themselves is a great way for a vendor to burn relationships with reps.
 
decius_mus said:
It is their fault for running their mouth like they were absolutely sure it would release. They did the same thing with the CC9. Now they are saying that their relationship with HK's rep group has deteriorated. I don't know what happened behind closed doors, but repeatedly broadcasting preliminary product information before manufacturers announce it themselves is a great way for a vendor to burn relationships with reps.
Click to expand...

The only thing that matters is what actually makes it on to the roster. What R66 or any other vendor says is quite frankly irreverent because they are not the manufacturer or DOJ. They are just a messenger. They are not making decisions. If you fail to recognize their role and make too much of what they said it's your own problem. A vendor's relationship status with their rep is totally inconsequential to what makes it to the roster nor does it have any impact on us, the consumer base.
 
JackRydden224 said:
The only thing that matters is what actually makes it on to the roster. What R66 or any other vendor says is quite frankly irreverent because they are not the manufacturer or DOJ. They are just a messenger. They are not making decisions. If you fail to recognize their role and make too much of what they said it's your own problem. A vendor's relationship status with their rep is totally inconsequential to what makes it to the roster nor does it have any impact on us, the consumer base.
Click to expand...
I wasn't suggesting that R66's leaks had any bearing on whether or not a gun would get rostered. That's ridiculous. The context here is about bullying R66 for leaks that never came true. In this case it's absolutely deserved.
 
decius_mus said:
I wasn't suggesting that R66's leaks had any bearing on whether or not a gun would get rostered. That's ridiculous. The context here is about bullying R66 for leaks that never came true. In this case it's absolutely deserved.
Click to expand...
Who cares? It's been generally true that all of those guns were attempting to get on the roster, it's just that some like Glock haven't done it yet. why should he be bullied for letting us know companies are trying to get their pistols to us?
 
decius_mus said:
I wasn't suggesting that R66's leaks had any bearing on whether or not a gun would get rostered. That's ridiculous. The context here is about bullying R66 for leaks that never came true. In this case it's absolutely deserved.
Click to expand...

Bullying R66 accomplishes what exactly?

Like I said, those leaks should never be taken seriously. It's just what could happen and not what will happen. For people to take those leaks seriously because they dont' understand nuanaces and then justify bullying R66 is some emotionally unstable Karen move. It's childish. Get off of it.
 
JackRydden224 said:
Bullying R66 accomplishes what exactly?

Like I said, those leaks should never be taken seriously. It's just what could happen and not what will happen. For people to take those leaks seriously because they dont' understand nuanaces and then justify bullying R66 is some emotionally unstable Karen move. It's childish. Get off of it.
Click to expand...
No every leak needs to be taken seriously! Just like the $5K i am getting from the government so I can afford the CC bill for all the guns I just bought after hearing about it 😂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom