18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

  • Welcome

    Welcome to CAguns

    Join California’s gun owner community. Create a free account to join discussions and explore member features.

There’s been a shooting at the Islamic center of SD. Shooters and security guard killed. 4 minute response time by PD.

Third wing? Or three percent?
Nah 3%'er is some thing for militia super pro america guys. It's called "third positionist"

The Third Position is a set of neo-🥔 political ideologies that were first described in Western Europe following the Second World War.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> Developed in the context of the Cold War, it developed its name through the claim that it represented a third position between the capitalism of the Western Bloc and the 👨🏻‍🎨m of the Eastern Bloc
 
Nah 3%'er is some thing for militia super pro america guys. It's called "third positionist"

The Third Position is a set of neo-🥔 political ideologies that were first described in Western Europe following the Second World War.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> Developed in the context of the Cold War, it developed its name through the claim that it represented a third position between the capitalism of the Western Bloc and the 👨🏻‍🎨m of the Eastern Bloc
I wonder if this is aligned at all with Alexander Dugin’s fourth political theory
 
i dont have tweeter to watch it, is it worse than the christchurch video? :unsure:
No. They for some reason chose for their “epic livestream” to film their torso instead of the actual events. All that is visible is them fumbling with guns and malfunctions, a body in the ground in the parking lot with some blood, and then a slightly better view of the loser sitting himself in the face. The last part is NSFW and would not recommend someone squeamish watch it, but the whole video does not give you much insight into what happened. Maybe if someone freezes frames and figures out the crap they wrote all over their guns in white out that might give us some info, but the entire thing is also someone ELSE filming the livestream from another phone and they can’t keep it still, so it’s very difficult to follow.
 
At the end the dude shoots the latino then domes himself
Jerry Seinfeld Popcorn GIF by Sheets & Giggles
 
No. They for some reason chose for their “epic livestream” to film their torso instead of the actual events. All that is visible is them fumbling with guns and malfunctions, a body in the ground in the parking lot with some blood, and then a slightly better view of the loser sitting himself in the face. The last part is NSFW and would not recommend someone squeamish watch it, but the whole video does not give you much insight into what happened. Maybe if someone freezes frames and figures out the crap they wrote all over their guns in white out that might give us some info, but the entire thing is also someone ELSE filming the livestream from another phone and they can’t keep it still, so it’s very difficult to follow.
Additionally, writings are visible on a gun, including drawings of SS bolts and neo-🥨 insignias, sources said. From the thing i linked earlier
 
Yes there was a pluralism aspect to Dugin’s theory but I’ve seen a lot of alt right neo 🥨 types align with it and add in the racism
Why i said yes and no, dont know how much is in line with Dugin but theres probably some.
 
Additionally, writings are visible on a gun, including drawings of SS bolts and neo-🥨 insignias, sources said. From the thing i linked earlier
Yeah you can clearly see that in the video, but there are like full sentences/phrases written out that someone can probably extract from freeze frames that haven’t been reported. I’m too apathetic to try and tackle that. Maybe it’s just boring 14 words BS but it might clue us in to their motivations/ideology
 
Yeah you can clearly see that in the video, but there are like full sentences/phrases written out that someone can probably extract from freeze frames that haven’t been reported. I’m too apathetic to try and tackle that. Maybe it’s just boring 14 words BS but it might clue us in to their motivations/ideology
Authorities looking into the motivation behind the shooting are working to authenticate the lengthy typewritten document, which is filled with vitriol about Muslims, Jewish people, Black people, Latino people, the LGBTQ community, women and various other identity groups. The document features 🥨 iconography and explicit references to accelerationism

They dropped a 75 page document allegedly
 
Authorities looking into the motivation behind the shooting are working to authenticate the lengthy typewritten document, which is filled with vitriol about Muslims, Jewish people, Black people, Latino people, the LGBTQ community, women and various other identity groups. The document features 🥨 iconography and explicit references to accelerationism

They dropped a 75 page document allegedly
Wonder if we’ll ever see it. Personally I don’t think they should keep that stuff secret, I mean sure I agree with 75% of the unabomber’s manifesto but that doesn’t mean I endorse him using violence against innocent academics. Good lord I just got myself put on a list, didn’t I?
 
Back
Top Bottom