18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Wilson Combat EDC X9 2.0 added on the handgun roster, MSRP $3,647.00($3,399.99 - Turner's)

man they did really F- this up though, if you look at the optic ready version they are using a plate that retains the iron sight and it would indeed take the space that the LCI is in. Meanwhile 10 other companies have figured out that you can make a tiny lci that doesn't interfere with the plate or even better stick it on the extractor. These companies really shouldn't keep these guns a surprise until after they are on the roster, they should advertise them so we can tell them how they F-ed up ahead of time.
 
man they did really F- this up though, if you look at the optic ready version they are using a plate that retains the iron sight and it would indeed take the space that the LCI is in. Meanwhile 10 other companies have figured out that you can make a tiny lci that doesn't interfere with the plate or even better stick it on the extractor. These companies really shouldn't keep these guns a surprise until after they are on the roster, they should advertise them so we can tell them how they F-ed up ahead of time.
Agreed, that's the very thing that has kept me from buying some rostered guns such as the Sig MK25. Can't stand those obnoxious LCIs that stick out the top
 
Agreed, that's the very thing that has kept me from buying some rostered guns such as the Sig MK25. Can't stand those obnoxious LCIs that stick out the top
I'm somewhat agnostic about it if it doesn't interfere with function but making it like the 226 or this wilson definitely interferes with cutting it for an optic which is annoying as hell. The 226 was one of the first to have it though and it's particularly ugly. You definitely can't buy an extra Wilson slide to get rid of though like you can with cheap guns that have it.
 
Devil's advocate moment, but if we rag on companies that bring things to roster despite the relatively slim pickings we already have, then we only disincentivize them from pursuing it even further. Mayhap better to let them bring things to roster, then let them figure out a price cut or street price slash on their own.

Not that it's on roster, but DD H9 was $1.3k for just the blaster, now it's $1k and comes with a free optics plate. Just as an example. Maybe even a good one, since they are an example of someone that still has no incentive to support CA beyond churning out milquetoast low-effort AR-15 offerings to this state.
 
Devil's advocate moment, but if we rag on companies that bring things to roster despite the relatively slim pickings we already have, then we only disincentivize them from pursuing it even further. Mayhap better to let them bring things to roster, then let them figure out a price cut or street price slash on their own.

Not that it's on roster, but DD H9 was $1.3k for just the blaster, now it's $1k and comes with a free optics plate. Just as an example. Maybe even a good one, since they are an example of someone that still has no incentive to support CA beyond churning out milquetoast low-effort AR-15 offerings to this state.
You aren't wrong. They still shoulda done it differently haha.
 
Devil's advocate moment, but if we rag on companies that bring things to roster despite the relatively slim pickings we already have, then we only disincentivize them from pursuing it even further. Mayhap better to let them bring things to roster, then let them figure out a price cut or street price slash on their own.

Not that it's on roster, but DD H9 was $1.3k for just the blaster, now it's $1k and comes with a free optics plate. Just as an example. Maybe even a good one, since they are an example of someone that still has no incentive to support CA beyond churning out milquetoast low-effort AR-15 offerings to this state.
Eh, yes and no. Overpriced is overpriced. There is no reason at all a Stacatto should cost $3k+, those are production handguns that should be closer to the price of the Platypus or Prodigy. Wilson Combat at least has some hand fitting done. For what it is, the price isn't that bad, just not something I could justify getting, especially with proprietary mags that are limited to 10 here anyway. I'd rather get their CQB model that's on the roster, or SSE a Platypus or XP Pro for half the price.
 
How in the hell did they not make this optic ready?!
Unreal. It’s pricey to get Wilson to do the cut and takes them about 6 weeks. This pic shows a RMR HD on my gen 1 EDC X9. That unfortunately doesnt actually work because the optic overhangs the ejection port and causes malfunctions. Changed to a 508T (? Or something like that)

Added pics of it with the different optic
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3776.webp
    IMG_3776.webp
    70.9 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_4374.webp
    IMG_4374.webp
    103.3 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4373.webp
    IMG_4373.webp
    118.6 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:
They should have done the LCI on the extractor like the VP9F. So easy to do!

No optic cut in 2026 is…a choice.
 
They should have done the LCI on the extractor like the VP9F. So easy to do!

No optic cut in 2026 is…a choice.
There’s gotta be some issue with the LCI on the extractor because pretty much only HK has done that. Altho wait…..isnt the Stac HD that way too? Seems to be the obvious solution? Dunno

No optic cut is still sorta the “norm” with the Wilson’s and Nighthawks “stock”. It’s always extra for the optic cut

I am guessing we will see optic cut version of this sooner than later
 
There’s gotta be some issue with the LCI on the extractor because pretty much only HK has done that. Altho wait…..isnt the Stac HD that way too? Seems to be the obvious solution? Dunno

No optic cut is still sorta the “norm” with the Wilson’s and Nighthawks “stock”. It’s always extra for the optic cut

I am guessing we will see optic cut version of this sooner than later
The echelon has it on the extractor too.
 
There’s gotta be some issue with the LCI on the extractor because pretty much only HK has done that. Altho wait…..isnt the Stac HD that way too? Seems to be the obvious solution? Dunno

No optic cut is still sorta the “norm” with the Wilson’s and Nighthawks “stock”. It’s always extra for the optic cut

I am guessing we will see optic cut version of this sooner than later

I am wondering if this will spur Nighthawk to make some “new” CA guns outside of that gunsmith program thing they have
I paid extra for the optic cut on my nighthawk, but they clearly had space for it. No such planning seems to have happened for this new WC offering. Too bad. I’d think about getting it with an optic. But this actually makes me like the new Staccatos better. And I didn’t like them very much.
 
That LCI is not too bad. But if you send it off to be milled for a red dot, whoever does the milling can probably just delete the LCI to make room for the red dot. The LCI just has to be there to be sold as new from a dealer. It doesn’t have to stay there to remain legal.

I just noticed the obnoxious warning engraved on the left side, though. That kind of sucks.
 
Last edited:
one issue if the optic cut deletes the LCI is that some IA will require it to be there. Mine would. For my IA if the gun came with LCI and mag safety it’s gotta stay there. The inspector actually seems to go through the trouble of finding out if the gun originated with those or not. I had to reinstall my mag safety for my p365 to pass inspection.
 
I don't understand why Wilson Combat would bother to come out with a CA version pistol that aint optic ready.

That's just so stupid.
 
Back
Top Bottom