Not sure on the loyalty thing.I really do appreciate your loyalty, but let’s do some basic math. $600/year for BOTH ads and memberships.
For easy numbers. The contributors plan was $20 per 6 month $30 per year $300 lifetime.
Let’s just say at $20/6 mo 1 person contributed to $40/year. That takes 15 people at its lowest plan to hit $600/year not including ads. The number of registered users was ~374,000.
The number of ads were also about 8 spots at the top of each page. The number of impressions was 1 million in June on cloud. Typically an advertiser would pay on the low end $1-2 per 100k x 8 advertisers per month.
In full transparency, just the ad at the top and sidebar pulls $100/mo, not including memberships. This site with all the licenses and add-ons is well over $2k to startup, not including cloud costs. Most of what I get I reinvest into features that were missing. The search feature alone cost $500 plus another server to run for indexing. The classifieds and feedback system cost an annual fee as well. Calguns was fixed at $179 no add-ons.
Thanks to contributors I’m able to break even with the support and offer this for free. Otherwise I wouldn’t support a losing endeavor and also why I offered to help for free the first time around, it was easier to help. Now that I’m somewhat committed. I’m building out this site.
![]()
calguns.net Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2026]
calguns.net is ranked #40809 in US with 0 Traffic. Categories: Retail. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!www.semrush.com
I’m trying to level with some of you as someone who’s done thing for the last 20 years in the space. Typically I work for big companies, so I have some knowledge in both advertising and t
I hope this site runs wild and you make a hefty profit on it. I think Kestryll could have done the same with Calguns but I don't think it was managed well. It never seemed like more than an afterthought or side gig, even back when it was running well. I don't know where the money he was bringing in went or what he did with it, but I am pretty confident it was nowhere near as high as many people think it was. Sucks for him, and sucks for all of the users, and sucks for the historical knowledge and information that was (is?) there.
I haven't looked into contributor status or whatever it's called here. I'll do that, as I'm happy to help fund a place I will likely spend quite a bit time on and which will be beneficial to me.
Thanks for putting it together, it is appreciated!

