- Messages
- 320
Well to be fair the paper targets were not 400lbs, growling, and charging at me . . .Did you shoot for accuracy? Then you have bear attack mitigation training!
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
Well to be fair the paper targets were not 400lbs, growling, and charging at me . . .Did you shoot for accuracy? Then you have bear attack mitigation training!
Or you can just save time and money and train with the round you intend to use rather than spend money on a gun and ammo for a round you don't even intend to ever use. As I posted previously, my first gun was a Glock 23, and that was the only gun I had for about a decade. I'm confident that I am more proficient with 40 than most people who claim to be. Did that experience make me a better 9mm shooter, more so than if I had just started shooting 9 for a decade? Maybe. But with that decade of experience under my belt, I say just skip 40 and start shooting 9. There's no reason to shoot 40s anymore unless you still have a couple of them lying around, as I do, most of which I got super cheap for the price of the frames to convert to 9.If you hate .40. Go and train with it. It will. Make you a better 9mm shooter
NonsenseIn Soviet Russia, bear shoot you with .40
Always remember: bear likely has Tokarev concealed somewhere.Nonsense
You sit down with bear in front of samovar filled with vodka and drink yourself to death
Now THAT’S a hot little round!! Love shooting Tok.Always remember: bear likely has Tokarev concealed somewhere.
It's on my list of wants. Some day...Now THAT’S a hot little round!! Love shooting Tok.
not a fan of small guns, carried full size 1911 for years, had glocks 34-35-41 and I felt like those advertised to the world I was carrying while the 1911 made me feel secure, tried compact 1911's and went back to full size. everyone is different, go rent the gun and shoot as many things come into play when you carry from concealment to making sure you hit the target beyond 15 yards because you never know what scenario you will find yourself into.Working on my CCW and just completed my interview last week. They suggested I should add another gun to my application just in case(don’t have to tell me twice). Currently have a shield 9mm and I’m looking at other options. Found another shield in 40sw but I’m debating on going for it since the price is good, or get something else in 9mm and keep it consistent. Need a bit of help lol
Debating on a shield plus in 9mm or canik mete mc9 if I don’t go with the shield in 40
Shot placement matters more than anything in my humble opinion and 40 will be rowdy in a small firearm like the shield. I say go with the 9 !Working on my CCW and just completed my interview last week. They suggested I should add another gun to my application just in case(don’t have to tell me twice). Currently have a shield 9mm and I’m looking at other options. Found another shield in 40sw but I’m debating on going for it since the price is good, or get something else in 9mm and keep it consistent. Need a bit of help lol
Debating on a shield plus in 9mm or canik mete mc9 if I don’t go with the shield in 40
Always thought that if Glock or cz made gun chambered in it they would make a killingNow THAT’S a hot little round!! Love shooting Tok.
Omg yourThis thread is boring without pics!
Carry a man's gun and not a little sissy pistol!
Alchemy Custom Weaponry Prime Elite Carry in 45 ACP with stylish ring hammer and Herretts D45 stocks!
View attachment 170880
As a long time fan of all things 40, I say that’s an entirely appropriate reaction, haha!!Damn it. This thread made me kinda want to get another 40 like a USP.
But they're the same in ballistics so eitherA simple thought exercise.
If you had to pick to get hit by either 9mm or .4 and you had no choice out of it...
I'm willing to bet most if not all would pick the 9mm...
Get shot where? Since shot placement is what really matters? Youre phucked either way if you get shot in the heart or back of the head.A simple thought exercise.
If you had to pick to get hit by either 9mm or .4 and you had no choice out of it...
I'm willing to bet most if not all would pick the 9mm...
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!