By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
That's not newSlide and barrel are serialized looks like.
Listed to diatributors
LOL, how? It doesn't meet any of the requirements and if California gives them a pass on the roster, other manufacturers are going to lose their !@#$.How lets hope it gets on roster.
LOL, how? It doesn't meet any of the requirements and if California gives them a pass on the roster, other manufacturers are going to lose their !@#$.
Duh, right? Glock would obviously have to make a CA-compliant version that can get on the roster. I know that's what you meant. Not sure why anyone would be triggered by someone hoping Glock makes a CA-compliant version.LOL....by adding the CA features needed?
It does look like the best Glock yet, and by that same logic, the best semiautomatic pistol yet. They improved the ergonomics, got rid of the stupid MOS system, and didn't sacrifice reliability. Getting rid of MOS is a noticeable improvement alone. Fingers crossed they make a CA-compliant version. They would easily outsell anything else on the roster. Don't really care about the FCU concept, I'd rather just buy a 17/47 and 19, then I could have 4 configurations: 19, 45, 17/47, and 49.Looks like it will be available right at Shot Show.
Looks like they took the Shadow Systems idea and made it their own, along with many other features lol. They did this to improve the MOS system substantially. Hopefully it will be good enough for CA.What the heck is that extractor? Looks big enough for the ugly text inscription requirement… maybe the CLI finally becomes an LCI for CA…
They kept the Gen 3 alive likely because of CA, I don't think they want to lose the CA Market, we probably buy more than many countries.The fact Glock used this to get completely out from under Gen 3 production, knowing that meant the end in California doesn't fill me with confidence they will bother with us going forward.
So... almost everything that I've done to a Gen 3, they're including in a Gen 6? Took them long enough but it's not like we got Gen 4 or Gen 5, doesn't seem likely we'll get Gen 6.
Gen 6 will be great for newcomers getting into firearms or Glocks.
Except for the short life on the P365 trigger return spring breaking after only 1k rounds.I’m not impressed. P365>Gen6. Carry on.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!