- Messages
- 634
- Classified ads
- 1
Asshats when it was STI, asshats still. Shocking. Shocking, I say!
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
One of the reasons I like buying local is I can actually handle the gun before I buy.
I don't see anything indicating they will do that other than wild guesses. That would probably hurt them. Unless they are giving up competing against Kimber and Sig and going for the ultra high end only market..... which is again just conjectureThink about it. Reduce the number manufactured after cutting out dealers. Raise the price to cover operating costs plus profit and you do that year on year.
I don't see anything indicating they will do that other than wild guesses. That would probably hurt them. Unless they are giving up competing against Kimber and Sig and going for the ultra high end only market..... which is again just conjecture
Staccato as a company is the product of Nathan Horvath who is essentially a finance guy that bought STI and made it into Staccato. They have a brand new factory only a few years old and a rapidly expanding lineup. This growth was built into the brand and this is likely just a modern business tactic, the company can't just take what it gets it has to actively grow to be able to pay off the investment. Nothing like this ever results in a better product though, does it?Can't help but wonder if this is a precursor to a sale of the company or if it's just a move to try and maintain their grip on the 2011 market which is quickly becoming saturated with offerings from many manufactures seeking to enter the game. Personally I think there's enough of a market to go around for all but Staccato has enjoyed great growth previous and may now feel itself being squeezed a bit by others seeking a "piece of the 2011 pie"
I do wanna say that I really enjoy my earlier Staccato purchase (singular) and have no regrets. This does not upset me to the point where I regret my buy. But it may affect future purchase considerations.
Yeah the mag compatibility is huge. That will save me hundreds and hundreds of dollarsif I really want a 2011, I'll probably get a Sig or Kimber. Pretty sure both of those will be in stores eventually. I'd rather have the Sig that uses P320 mags.
Well that scratches STI off my list
HK/Walther SupremacySame here
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!