I am reading your article. It’s actually quite flawed and clearly an emotionally driven article.
Just because someone is an MD doesn’t make them an expert. C’s get degrees.
I have personally corrected severe mistakes made by MD’s and saved lives as a Chiropractor. I work WITH medicine, WITH PT, WITH acupuncture, WITH naturopathy.
MD’s send patients to me because I get results. I send patients to MD when they need surgery or injections, MRI’s, labs to investigate more nefarious concerns. I recommend PT to my patients daily. I send patients to Acupuncture when their issue is rooted in emotion or impulse issues I can’t resolve.
Acupuncture is not evidence-based medicine. Neither is naturopathy, nor is chiropractic. That doesn't mean that everything you do is wrong or doesn't bring some perceived short-term relief. The placebo effect is a thing. Care given by a provider (even a soothsayer) for some people is enough. Some people just want to talk to someone who knows something, anything, even if the person claiming to know something knows nothing (like a "psychic"). I'm not saying this is you, but bedside manner as you know goes a LONG way.
Sometimes simply being seen with good bedside manner is going to make the patient feel better, which is a natural advantage of the alt-med crowd. Some chiropractors are better than others too, depending on how much pseudoscience they mix in. If you're basically doing what is tantamount to PT and diagnosing via XRays and pragmatic medicine, then you're closer to the evidence-based side. It really depends on the chiro, straight (the most pseudoscience) versus the "mixers", which it sounds adjacent to your practice. I would never go to a chiro, but a lot of people claim benefit if the practices themselves are not really approved, and can and do cause harm (in violation of the Hippocratic Oath). First, Do No Harm.
I'm also assuming that you're too smart to believe that subluxations are the root of all disease. To me, that's something a "Straight" chiro would say, and would be an obvious red flag.
Also, I would never claim that an MD makes someone an expert. This is fallacious logic and a strawman. An MD simply proves some level of *accredited* training. I've met doctors personally who are dumb, or who make silly conclusions, or who lack patience and diligence, and a bunch of other deficiencies. I'm sure I could meet the best chiro in the world and despite the fact that the whole practice is rooted in nonsense (D.D. Palmer), some might be super diligent, pragmatic, and know when to refer patients beyond their ken.
I've also met vets who were retarded. One vet wanted to use acupuncture on my cat. I almost laughed her out of the office. I did debate her a little bit and voice my extreme and blatant skepticism. That's almost as dumb as trying to force a vegan diet on an obligate carnivore.
I think if you dropped Acupuncture and Naturopathy (and Homeopathy if you currently employ it), you'd be that much better, at least for smart skeptics who know better. The most gullible patients would be retained. Homeopathy is OBVIOUSLY false for anyone who's read about it.
People who have emotional issues should see a therapist, but a GOOD therapist. Lots of bad therapists out there, something we probably agree on. I would never go to a female or feminist therapist in a million years. Really, a good day at the range is all the therapy most of us need.