- Messages
- 857
- Classified ads
- 1
I hate fin grips. AR’s featureless are a hard pass for me.Could probably buy a rifle length Juggernaut AR-9 and make it featureless. But I don't think it comes that way from the factory.
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
I hate fin grips. AR’s featureless are a hard pass for me.Could probably buy a rifle length Juggernaut AR-9 and make it featureless. But I don't think it comes that way from the factory.
It was the looks that drew me in. It was the reviews that pushed me away.No, that thing sounds awful. Pretty though.
So was I, then saw the drunk engineer takedown of this thing and said no.Yeah, I was interested for about 5 minutes, then did some actual research on it. Not great.
Maybe in a few years, enough on shelves and warehouses to last a few years of sales.So, my Ruger PC Carbine that has been a safe queen since I bought it. Might end up bringing a little (not gouging) higher price if I decide to sell?
Maybe, but who'd want a SP101 in 38 spl, when SP101 in 357/38 exist... lol.Looks like my SP101 .38 spl just went up in value again
Someone who only wanted to shoot .38 and have less crud in cylinders and forcing cone due to the longer Dimensions.Maybe, but who'd want a SP101 in 38 spl, when SP101 in 357/38 exist... lol.
Good question. 25% isn't a controlling interest, but Beretta gets two board seats, so there's definitely some strategy in play. There's also a three-year "standstill" agreement that restricts Beretta from exceeding 25% ownership or engaging in another proxy fight. So it follows that Ruger may be eliminating less profitable product lines to improve margins and demonstrate that current management can turn things around, strengthening its position against further takeover efforts.The LCR is also included in the discontinued list. That is a surprise. I doubt it will be updated.
Does anyone know how this move and Beretta’s attempt to buy a controlling interest are connected? How does this model line adjustment benefit or weaken either position?
Yea, whomever gave you that info probably mixed them up. Beretta has been aggressively trying to work their way into Colts business via a hostile takeover and proxy fight. Apparently the FTC even stepped in a one point. This from Ruger tells the story pretty clearly:Vance Outdoors.
Ruger 2030. Changes to lineup and future.
![]()
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. Q4 2025 Earnings Call Summary
Moby summary of Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.'s Q4 2025 earnings callfinance.yahoo.com
the CZolt for Ruger could be unfounded rumor, but the others seem to be confirmed.
Depends how long they support the product and keep making parts but you might as well get spares nowCurious- if i need spare parts for my pc carbine, im SoL going forward?
Don't play with my emotions!Ruger 2011 coming soon, my bet.
In 22lr no less, with triple stack mags going upto 30 rounds.
I would prefer they brought something out featureless but with out that stupid take down feature. That is the main reason I don't own one. I think it was a bad design choice.Ruger PC, a very important component, the barrel is not sold by Ruger like they do for other guns. Taccom are the ONLY aftermarket PC barrel maker and thecost $400 shipped to your ffl since we in CA.
Basically, anything happens to that PC barrel you currently own, you f'd.
Maybe that is one reason for the end of production for the PC.