18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Seeing Glock Gen 3s on here going for $700+. What gives? AB1127 hasn’t been enacted yet

I've owned a CZ 75 BD 9mm for a very long time, and, have also fired many Glocks. Never fired one I liked. Not one. I like the Hammer. In my opinion, CZ's are the best hand gun in the world. Never have been a fan of Glocks and never will be.
Handguns are so personally subjective. I despise both the aforementioned not because I think they suck, but because they suck in my hand. I shoot well with guns that some absolutely hate like the 92 or a large frame revolver. It’s all about how it feels and what you can do with that feeling.
 
No.
The law only applies to handguns that accept an aftermarket rear plate which allows the gun to run full auto.

Glock-Switch.png


Unless aftermarket rear plates which turn the gun into machine guns come out for other makes, then those makes would fall under the law as well.

I don't think any of the non-glock designs use a connector like a glock does that allows a simple switch to be made which defeats the connector.

I've only experienced G17's & 19's 3rd generation and never seen anything like that on them. Why in gods name would anyone want to convert a pistol into a full auto, even the US military after trying it called it a failure and that was years ago.
 
Theory-

549 +tax + 11% + DROS = 700

If they are trying to get all their money back then that’s what they ask. And if the given model is OOS then if you want it, you will pay.

In the old days, when we had the 1 in 30, the ppt was exempt so a little bit of value in no waiting.
Which indicates $600 for a new PP G17, 19 etc. is a realistic price
 
I've owned a CZ 75 BD 9mm for a very long time, and, have also fired many Glocks. Never fired one I liked. Not one. I like the Hammer. In my opinion, CZ's are the best hand gun in the world. Never have been a fan of Glocks and never will be.
You probably haven't put enough rounds through one. I'm a fan of many different guns, but if you want to shoot them all well, you have to spend money on ammo.
 
I'm amazed at all these guys saying Glocks aren't worth $700. I've owned a lot of guns and lot of very high end guns. If I could only pick one hand gun it would be Glock. Go try and run $4000 Staccato even a little bit dry and see what happens.

Wouldn't this new law effectively ban all striker fired handguns? I think would also ban any transfers, so there wouldn't be a secondary market. I could be wrong.
People just be hating on Glocks. I’ve owned Staccatos, OA2311, MPA, Atlas, And RCD
All great guns but I sold all of them and just kept my Glock 26 and 34. No issues with them and they run. Why am I spending 3000-8k on pistols that I shoot the same accuracy with a 500-700 Glock. Right now I’m buying every Glock I see in 9mm $400-450 range
( Glock in every room is the goal)

That being said I fine Glocks to be standard “Cali” pisto, outside I would say CZ. CZ is the only pistol I would swap my Glocks out for. But people selling p10c/f for 1500 and it’s a 450 pistol.
 
People just be hating on Glocks. I’ve owned Staccatos, OA2311, MPA, Atlas, And RCD
All great guns but I sold all of them and just kept my Glock 26 and 34. No issues with them and they run. Why am I spending 3000-8k on pistols that I shoot the same accuracy with a 500-700 Glock. Right now I’m buying every Glock I see in 9mm $400-450 range
( Glock in every room is the goal)

That being said I fine Glocks to be standard “Cali” pisto, outside I would say CZ. CZ is the only pistol I would swap my Glocks out for. But people selling p10c/f for 1500 and it’s a 450 pistol.
Unfortunately paying up for CA non compliant models appears to be the norm. Obviously the actual selling price is what the buyer is willing to pay.
 
I don't think asking $700 for a nib G17 is unreasonable - I just don't think the buyers are that plentiful at that price.

Turners has the Gen3 G17 on sale for for $520.

Using their normal price of $550 and adding 20.75 % (Los Angeles sales & excise tax), the pre-DROS price is $664.

Unless it's just really super convenient, why would anyone spend more for the pre-owned (NIB) G17?

The $700 seller has to be telling his wife, "Look, I've got it up for sale, but no one wants to buy it. The economy really sucks right now."
 
If this goes through and is not stopped in the courts as it should be, it'll be interesting to read this thread in a year or two or five.

I'm bummed for the next generation of lawful gun owners in California.
 
You know what's atrocious? Polymer gun users putting on a stipple thinking it is an upgrade worth the extra cost.

95% of that 💩 grips looks atrocious. The other 5%? Gotta be professionally done by a nationally reputable smith.

Painters? Yea, painting your gun is a minus.
 
You know what's atrocious? Polymer gun users putting on a stipple thinking it is an upgrade worth the extra cost.

95% of that 💩 grips looks atrocious. The other 5%? Gotta be professionally done by a nationally reputable smith.

Painters? Yea, painting your gun is a minus.
As someone who put way too much money into my P320 I can say yeah, it really sucks when you put way too much money into a pile of you know what....
 
I'm amazed at all these guys saying Glocks aren't worth $700. I've owned a lot of guns and lot of very high end guns. If I could only pick one hand gun it would be Glock. Go try and run $4000 Staccato even a little bit dry and see what happens.

Wouldn't this new law effectively ban all striker fired handguns?
From the bill:

16885.​

(a) As used in this part, “machinegun-convertible pistol” means any semiautomatic pistol with a cruciform trigger bar that can be readily converted by hand or with common household tools, as defined in Section 4082 of Title 11 of the California Code of Regulations, into a machinegun by the installation or attachment of a pistol converter as a replacement for the slide’s backplate without any additional engineering, machining, or modification of the pistol’s trigger mechanism.
(b) A machinegun-convertible pistol does not include a hammer-fired semiautomatic pistol or striker-fired semiautomatic pistol lacking a cruciform trigger bar, which instead has a trigger bar that is shielded from interference by a pistol converter.

I think would also ban any transfers, so there wouldn't be a secondary market. I could be wrong.
From the Bill:
27595. (a)on January 1, 2026, a firearms dealer licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26920, shall not sell, offer for sale, exchange, give, transfer, or deliver any semiautomatic machinegun-convertible pistol,
(c) This section shall not apply to any of the following:
(3) A private party to private party transaction conducted through a licensed firearms dealer pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 28050).
 
AB 1127 Status (2 Sep):
Out of Senate Appropriations Suspense
Ordered to Senate Second Reading and amended (LEO exemption)
Ordered to repeat Second Reading
Upon completion of Second Reading the bill will advance to Third reading on the Senate Floor. This will allow limitedd debate by Senators.
If approved, the bill will be sent back to the Assembly for concurrence in amendments.
If approved, the bill will be engrossed and then Enrolled to the Governor for consideration
 
I'm guessing if AB 1127 gets signed by Newsom the local CA FFL's would have massive price reductions on all Gen 3 Glocks. In order to liquidate all the inventory, they have on hand before the law takes effect, and they can no longer sale in CA.

There only other option would be to sale to out of state buyers. And they would be competing against Gen5 Glocks the only way to compete would be to sale the Gen3s significantly cheaper than the Gen5s. So, they might as well just sale them to us in CA while they still can.

What are your guy's thoughts on this?
 
I've owned a CZ 75 BD 9mm for a very long time, and, have also fired many Glocks. Never fired one I liked. Not one. I like the Hammer. In my opinion, CZ's are the best hand gun in the world. Never have been a fan of Glocks and never will be.
Really, CZ 75. That's the gun your going to put up against a Glock. A gun with slide so narrow you can't even put an optic on it. A slide design that where you basically have nothing to grab to even do a proper press check. Ask me how I know.

At one point I owned seven CZ pistols. I owned multiple Shadows. I owned versions modify by Cajun Gunworks and CZ Customs. They have all been sold.
 
Back
Top Bottom