lol what? I'm intimately familiar with the colorado river water rights and it goes to the imperial valley where 80% of it is used for agriculture before any cities get to use it. The entire allocation from the Colorado river for Ca is a maximum of 4.4 million acre ft. In total, Ca uses about 40 million acre ft of water per year, only 8 million acre ft goes to cites for domestic use and the rest goes to agriculture. The cities aren't running out of water, it's agriculture that runs out of water but the allocation is complex because it's based on water rights, water rights are property rights so many farms have dibs before cities. But Cities do get some preferential treatment, in low water years cities will get water when ag is cut off because people literally need it. Anyway, lots of people support desal and if you want the state to pay for that you should ask them to, you will have to convince voters to pay for it though through a bond or sales tax. But I support public utilities like SMUD, they tend to be cheaper. It's not as simple as it sounds though because salt is a waste product, even if it's dumped into the ocean it can cause problems. But I do think that desal is the only long term option, but conservation goes a long way along with that. If we actually were in trouble we could allocate more water away from agriculture, but we aren't even close to running out of water to run our cities even wth 35 million people as it's only 20% of the total water usage in the state.