By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
It's not bad, but it's not great either. The actual take up/slack and wall to break is pretty good for a stock pistol. The hinge is not the greatest and detracts from the otherwise decent trigger. But I don't notice it too much anymore.Wow man, it takes a lot of discipline not to be tempted with modifying the Shield 1.0 -- particularly the trigger. Shield is an awesome pistol, the trigger is horrible .... or is it???
Actually that whole generation from that time not just S&W other manufacturers put out some pretty horrible Striker Fired triggers.
Nevertheless I do realize with enough practice, one can be extremely proficient with just about any firearm, and so many of us (myself included) have upgrade illness![]()
I've replaced the main spring on a USP, and used an after-market one (Wolff, it was cheaper). Does that count as "not completely bone stock"?HK USP doesn't need a thing out of the box
Same here usp45HK USP doesn't need a thing out of the box
96% of mine are. Odd question.
Dayum...The market for gun accessories in 2024-2025 is $9 Billion.
Does bone stock also mean no lights, no optics; with the exemption of tritium or fiber optic iron sights?
Also are non-conventional/non-traditional rifle caliber pistols excluded from this topic?
I think the Oem trigger on the xdās are a little nicer than Oem Glock. Less of a wall, more of a roll, but some may say itās mushy compared to Glock.XD45 first pistol I've ever purchased. Bone stock, not even night sights. While I love the accuracy, I've never felt the need to throw money at an XD.